Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The effect of My Health Record use in the emergency department on clinician-assessed patient care: results from a survey.
Mullins, Alexandra; O'Donnell, Renee; Morris, Heather; Ben-Meir, Michael; Hatzikiriakidis, Kostas; Brichko, Lisa; Skouteris, Helen.
  • Mullins A; School Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. Alexandra.mullins@monash.edu.
  • O'Donnell R; School Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
  • Morris H; School Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
  • Ben-Meir M; School Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
  • Hatzikiriakidis K; Cabrini Health, 181-183 Wattletree Rd, Malvern, VIC, 3144, Australia.
  • Brichko L; Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
  • Skouteris H; Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, Melbourne University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 22(1): 178, 2022 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1928180
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The emergency department has been a major focus for the implementation of Australia's national electronic health record, known as My Health Record. However, the association between use of My Health Record in the emergency department setting and patient care is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of emergency department clinicians regarding My Health Record use frequency, the benefits of My Health Record use (with a focus on patient care) and the barriers to use.

METHODS:

All 393 nursing, pharmacy, physician and allied health staff employed within the emergency department at a tertiary metropolitan public hospital in Melbourne were invited to participate in a web-based survey, between 1 May 2021 and 1 December 2021, during the height of the Delta and Omicron Covid-19 outbreaks in Victoria, Australia.

RESULTS:

Overall, the survey response rate was 18% (70/393). Approximately half of the sample indicated My Health Record use in the emergency department (n = 39, 56%, confidence interval [CI] 43-68%). The results showed that users typically only engaged with My Health Record less than once per shift (n = 15, 39%, CI 23-55%). Just over half (n = 19/39, 54%, CI 32-65%) of all participants who use My Health Record agreed they could remember a time when My Health Record had been critical to the care of a patient. Overall, clinicians indicated the biggest barrier preventing their use of My Health Record is that they forget to utilise the system.

CONCLUSION:

The results suggest that My Health Record has not been adopted as routine practice in the emergency department, by the majority of participants. Close to half of self-identified users of My Health Record do not associate use as being critical to patient care. Instead, My Health Record may only be used in scenarios that clinicians perceive will yield the greatest benefit-which clinicians in this paper suggest is patients with chronic and complex conditions. Further research that explores the predictors to use and consumers most likely to benefit from use is recommended-and strategies to socialise this knowledge and educate clinicians is desperately required.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12911-022-01920-8

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12911-022-01920-8