[Monitoring of coercive measures and compulsory treatment in Germany]. / Monitoring von Zwangsmaßnahmen und Zwangsbehandlungen in Deutschland.
Nervenarzt
; 93(11): 1105-1111, 2022 Nov.
Article
in German
| MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1930377
ABSTRACT
Epidemiological registers on the burden of disease and adverse events (deaths, serious side effects, etc.) play an important role in the management, evaluation, and improvement of healthcare treatment for the population. This also applies to coercive measures in the psychiatric healthcare system. Such registers only became feasible on a broad basis due to the availability of electronic medical records and steadily increasing computing capacities; however, in most German states, registers have not been implemented. Data protection problems must be taken into account in the collation of person-related data but can be solved by appropriate pseudonymization procedures taking the prerequisites of data parsimony into account. Extensive data are now available from the Baden-Wuerttemberg register for coercive measures, which has been in existence since 2015 and which enabled, for instance, evaluating the consequences of the changes to the law following the 2018 ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint and the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic. In the meantime, there are also state-wide data collections in some other German states; however, unlike in Baden-Wuerttemberg, these registers do not include measures under guardianship law. A nationwide register for coercive measures, compulsory treatment and involuntary detention has justifiably repeatedly been demanded for a long time. A major obstacle is the historically developed separation between the responsibility of the German states for the detention regulated by public law and the Federal State for the scope of application of the guardianship law.
Keywords
Full text:
Available
Collection:
International databases
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Restraint, Physical
/
Coercion
Type of study:
Experimental Studies
/
Observational study
Limits:
Humans
Country/Region as subject:
Europa
Language:
German
Journal:
Nervenarzt
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS