Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Effect of Creative Arts Therapy on Psychological Distress in Health Care Professionals.
Moss, Marc; Edelblute, Anthony; Sinn, Hillary; Torres, Kristen; Forster, Jeri; Adams, Tisha; Morgan, Courtney; Henry, Michael; Reed, Katherine.
  • Moss M; Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Electronic address: marc.moss@CUAnschutz.edu.
  • Edelblute A; Ponzio Creative Arts Therapy Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
  • Sinn H; Ponzio Creative Arts Therapy Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
  • Torres K; Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Forster J; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Adams T; Ponzio Creative Arts Therapy Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
  • Morgan C; Lighthouse Writers Workshop, Denver, CO.
  • Henry M; Lighthouse Writers Workshop, Denver, CO.
  • Reed K; Ponzio Creative Arts Therapy Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Am J Med ; 135(10): 1255-1262.e5, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1930709
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Work-related psychological distress is common among health care professionals. We determined whether 4 creative arts therapy (CAT) programs were acceptable, feasible, and improved psychological distress and job turnover intention in health care professionals with burnout symptoms.

METHODS:

Health care professionals were enrolled during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic from September 2020 until July 2021. Participants attended in-person weekly 90-minute group session for 12 consecutive weeks. Intervention and control subjects completed surveys before the beginning and after the end of their cohort. The study outcomes were session attendance (feasibility), program satisfaction (acceptability), and change in symptoms of anxiety, depression, burnout, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and job turnover intention.

RESULTS:

We randomized 165 participants into 4 CAT interventions and 1 common control group across 3 sequential cohorts. Thirty-five randomized participants dropped out before the start of the cohort, and 16 were replaced from a waiting list. Therefore, the cohort consisted of 146 participants. On average, participants were 35 years old, white (85%), and female (92%). Overall, 52% were nurses, 10% were doctors, and 16% were behavioral health specialists. Participants attended a median of 9.5 [8-11] sessions. Program satisfaction was high with a median Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) score of 31 [17-32] out of a possible score of 32. Participants randomized to the intervention had improvements in anxiety (P < .0001) and depression scores (P = .0007), total posttraumatic stress disorder score (P =.0002), burnout scores (P = .001, .003, .008), and turnover intention (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

A CAT program is feasible, acceptable, and may reduce psychological distress and turnover intention for health care professionals.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Burnout, Professional / Psychological Distress / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Burnout, Professional / Psychological Distress / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article