Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effect of colchicine on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Lan, Shao-Huan; Hsu, Chi-Kuei; Lai, Chih-Cheng; Chang, Shen-Peng; Lu, Li-Chin; Hung, Shun-Hsing; Lin, Wei-Ting.
  • Lan SH; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Medical Technology, Putian University, Putian, China.
  • Hsu CK; Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Lai CC; Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Chang SP; Yijia Pharmacy, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Lu LC; School of Management, Putian University, Putian, China.
  • Hung SH; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Hospital, Chia Li, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Lin WT; Department of Orthopedic, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ann Med ; 54(1): 1956-1965, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1931623
ABSTRACT

AIM:

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the usefulness of colchicine in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS:

PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between database inception and November 12, 2021. Only RCTs that compared the clinical efficacy and safety of colchicine with other alternative treatments or placebos in patients with COVID-19 were included.

RESULTS:

Overall, 7 RCTs involving 16,024 patients were included; 7,794 patients were in the study group receiving colchicine and 8,230 were in the control group receiving placebo or standard treatment. The study and control groups had similar risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09; I2 = 0%). No significant difference was observed between the study and control groups in terms of the need for non-invasive ventilation (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.03; I2 = 0%), the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32-1.32; I2 = 58%), and length of hospital stay (mean difference, -0.42 days; 95% CI, -1.95 to 1.11; I2 = 62%). In addition, colchicine was associated with significantly higher risks of gastrointestinal adverse events (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.56-2.11; I2 = 0%) and diarrhoea (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.75-2.56; I2 = 9%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Colchicine does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, so it did not support the additional use of colchicine in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.Key messageColchicine could not reduce the mortality of patients with COVID-19.No significant difference was observed between the colchicine and comparators in terms of the need for non-invasive ventilation, need for mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay.Colchicine was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ann Med Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 07853890.2022.2096919

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ann Med Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 07853890.2022.2096919