Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Non-linear susceptibility to interferences in declarative memory formation.
Moyano, Malen D; Carbonari, Giulia; Bonilla, Matías; Pedreira, María E; Brusco, Luis I; Kaczer, Laura; Forcato, Cecilia.
  • Moyano MD; Laboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Carbonari G; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bonilla M; Laboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Pedreira ME; Laboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Brusco LI; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Kaczer L; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Forcato C; IFIBYNE-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0270678, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1933367
ABSTRACT
After encoding, memories go through a labile state followed by a stabilization process known as consolidation. Once consolidated they can enter a new labile state after the presentation of a reminder of the original memory, followed by a period of re-stabilization (reconsolidation). During these periods of lability the memory traces can be modified. Currently, some studies show a rapid stabilization after 30 min, while others show that stabilization occurs after longer periods (e.g. > 6 h). Here we investigate the effect of an interference treatment on declarative memory consolidation, comparing distinct time intervals after acquisition. On day 1, participants learned a list of non- syllable pairs (List 1). 5 min, 30 min, 3 h or 8 h later, they received an interference list (List 2) that acted as an amnesic agent. On day 2 (48 h after training) participants had to recall List 1 first, followed by List 2. We found that the List 1 memory was susceptible to interference when List 2 was administered 5 min or 3 h after learning but not when it was administered 30 min or 8 h after. We propose the possibility that this rapid memory protection could be induced by a fast and transient neocortical integration. Our results open a discussion about the contribution of molecular and systemic aspects to memory consolidation.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Memory Consolidation / Memory Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0270678

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Memory Consolidation / Memory Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0270678