Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical and Embryological Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques.
Banker, Manish; Arora, Parul; Banker, Jwal; Shah, Anand; Gupta, Reena; Shah, Sandeep.
  • Banker M; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Arora P; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Banker J; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Shah A; Department of Medicine, Unit 1, SVP General Hospital, Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Gupta R; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, New Delhi, India.
  • Shah S; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
J Hum Reprod Sci ; 15(2): 150-156, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1934417
ABSTRACT

Background:

The emergence of the COVID pandemic unfolded a series of precautions and dilemmas and the complete suspension of health services. With the gradual emergence of data showing near minimal effects of the virus on pregnancy, Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) services were gradually resumed following guidelines and advisories.

Aim:

The purpose of this study was to detect the COVID positivity rate in women undergoing ART treatment during the COVID pandemic and compare clinical and embryological outcomes to the ART cycles performed in the pre-COVID era. Study Setting and

Design:

This was a retrospective cohort study of all women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation, followed by a fresh or frozen embryo transfer (ET) between 1st October 2019 and 31st March 2020 (control group) and between 1st April 2020 and 31st September 2020 (study group) at Nova IVF Fertility Clinic, Ahmedabad. Material and

Methods:

The study group underwent ART during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in India and when gradual unlocking of facilities including ART was advised as per the national ART advisory by the ICMR in December 2020. The outcomes were compared with the control group (cycles in pre-covid time). Statistical

Analysis:

Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS (v25.0) and included Mann-Whitney U, Fisher's exact and Pearson Chi-square as appropriate. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results:

A total of 367 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) stimulations were initiated. A total of 342 retrievals and 606 ETs (171 fresh and 435 frozen) were completed during the study period with a COVID positivity rate of 6.8% (25/367) amongst fresh and 3.9% (18/453) amongst frozen ETs, respectively; the PR and IR in the study group was similar to the control group (47.6 vs. 55.1 P = 0.4 and 68.7 vs. 66.4; P = 0.52, respectively). The maternal complication rates were similar in both groups with a COVID positivity rate of 10.2% (23/225) and 1 maternal death in the study group. The live birth rates were similar.

Conclusions:

We did not find a noteworthy difference in the clinical and embryological outcomes in the IVF cycles conducted in the COVID era as compared to the pre-COVID time. Thus, with adequate precautions and safety measures, ART services conducted during the COVID pandemic have comparable birth outcomes and can be safely advocated.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: J Hum Reprod Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jhrs.jhrs_57_22

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: J Hum Reprod Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jhrs.jhrs_57_22