Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The dangers of reused personal protective equipment: healthcare workers and workstation contamination.
Doos, D; Barach, P; Alves, N J; Falvo, L; Bona, A; Moore, M; Cooper, D D; Lefort, R; Ahmed, R.
  • Doos D; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: devindoos@gmail.com.
  • Barach P; Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Alves NJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Falvo L; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Bona A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Moore M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Cooper DD; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Lefort R; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Ahmed R; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Hosp Infect ; 127: 59-68, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1936782
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to protect healthcare workers (HCWs). The practice of reusing PPE poses high levels of risk for accidental contamination by HCWs. Scarce medical literature compares practical means or methods for safe reuse of PPE while actively caring for patients.

METHODS:

In this study, observations were made of 28 experienced clinical participants performing five donning and doffing encounters while performing simulated full evaluations of patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Participants' N95 respirators were coated with a fluorescent dye to evaluate any accidental fomite transfer that occurred during PPE donning and doffing. Participants were evaluated using blacklight after each doffing encounter to evaluate new contamination sites, and were assessed for the cumulative surface area that occurred due to PPE doffing. Additionally, participants' workstations were evaluated for contamination.

RESULTS:

All participants experienced some contamination on their upper extremities, neck and face. The highest cumulative area of fomite transfer risk was associated with the hook and paper bag storage methods, and the least contamination occurred with the tabletop storage method. Storing a reused N95 respirator on a tabletop was found to be a safer alternative than the current recommendation of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to use a paper bag for storage. All participants donning and doffing PPE were contaminated.

CONCLUSION:

PPE reusage practices pose an unacceptably high level of risk of accidental cross-infection contamination to healthcare workers. The current design of PPE requires complete redesign with improved engineering and usability to protect healthcare workers.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2022 Document Type: Article