Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vein and Venous Sinus Thrombosis-A Systematic Review.
Bücke, Philipp; Hellstern, Victoria; Cimpoca, Alexandru; Cohen, José E; Horvath, Thomas; Ganslandt, Oliver; Bäzner, Hansjörg; Henkes, Hans.
  • Bücke P; Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Hellstern V; Neuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Cimpoca A; Neuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Cohen JE; Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9103401, Israel.
  • Horvath T; Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Ganslandt O; Neurochirurgische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Bäzner H; Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Henkes H; Neuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
J Clin Med ; 11(14)2022 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1938869
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cerebral venous sinus or vein thromboses (SVT) are treated with heparin followed by oral anticoagulation. Even after receiving the best medical treatment, numerous patients experience neurological deterioration, intracerebral hemorrhage or brain edema. Debate regarding whether endovascular treatment (EVT) is beneficial in such severe cases remains ongoing. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence supporting the use of EVT for SVT on the basis of case presentations, with a focus on patient selection, treatment strategies and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS:

This systemic literature review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective observational data analyzing five or more patients. Follow-up information (modified Rankin scale (mRS)) was required to be provided (individual patient data).

RESULTS:

21 records (n = 405 patients; 1 RCT, 20 observational studies) were identified. EVT was found to be feasible and safe in a highly selected patient cohort but was not associated with an increase in good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) in RCT data. In observational data, good functional outcomes were frequently observed despite an anticipated poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION:

The current evidence does not support the routine incorporation of EVT in SVT treatment. However, in a patient cohort prone to poor prognosis, EVT might be a reasonable therapeutic option. Further studies determining the patients at risk, choice of methods and devices, and timing of treatment initiation are warranted.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jcm11144215

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jcm11144215