Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Incorporating Digital Interventions into Mental Health Clinical Practice: a Pilot Survey of How Use Patterns, Barriers, and Opportunities Shifted for Clinicians in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Johansen, Sara L; Olmert, Tony; Chaudhary, Neha; Vasan, Nina; Aragam, Gowri G.
  • Johansen SL; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
  • Olmert T; University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA USA.
  • Chaudhary N; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA.
  • Vasan N; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
  • Aragam GG; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA.
J Technol Behav Sci ; : 1-5, 2022 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1943750
ABSTRACT
Although many digital mental health interventions are available, clinicians do not routinely use them in clinical practice. In this pilot survey, we review the factors that supported the rapid transition to televisits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we explore the barriers that continue to prevent clinicians from using other digital mental health interventions, such as mindfulness applications, mood trackers, and digital therapy programs. We conducted a pilot survey of mental health clinicians in different practice environments in the USA. Survey respondents (n = 51) were primarily psychiatrists working in academic medical centers. Results indicated that systemic factors, including workplace facilitation and insurance reimbursement, were primary reasons motivating clinicians to use televisits to provide remote patient care. The shift to televisits during the pandemic was not accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions in patient care. Nine clinicians reported that they have never used digital interventions with patients. Among the 42 clinicians who did report some experience using digital interventions, the majority reported no change in the use of digital applications since transitioning to televisits. Our preliminary findings lend insight into the perspective of mental health clinicians regarding the factors that supported their transition to televisits, including institutional support and insurance reimbursement, and indicate that this shift to virtual patient care has not been accompanied by increased use of other digital mental health interventions. We contend that the same systemic factors that supported the shift toward virtual visits in the COVID-19 pandemic may be applied to support the incorporation of other digital interventions in mental healthcare. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41347-022-00260-8.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: J Technol Behav Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: J Technol Behav Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article