Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of the cardiovascular system, clinical condition, and laboratory results in COVID-19 patients with and without vitamin D insufficiency.
Kazemi, Erfan; Mansursamaei, Ali; Rohani-Rasaf, Marzieh; Sheibani, Hossein.
  • Kazemi E; Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
  • Mansursamaei A; Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
  • Rohani-Rasaf M; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
  • Sheibani H; Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Imam Ave., Shahroud, 3616911151, Iran. h1a1sheyban@gmail.com.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 441, 2022 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951084
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Serum vitamin D levels may have a protective role against severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Studies have shown that deficiency in vitamin D may be a significant risk factor for poor outcomes. This study aims to compare the outcome and clinical condition of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection considering serum vitamin D levels.

METHODS:

In this cross-sectional study, 202 COVID-19 patients without known cardiovascular disease (reduced ejection fraction, uncontrolled arrhythmia, pericardial effusion, cardiac block, valvular disease, or hypertension) were included. Patients were divided into three groups of insufficient (< 30 ng/mL), normal (30 to 50 ng/mL), and high (> 50 ng/mL) serum vitamin D levels. Clinical outcome was defined as severe if invasive respiratory intervention and ICU admission was required.

RESULTS:

The patients were divided into three groups based on their vitamin D level 127 cases in the insufficient vitamin D group, 53 cases in the normal vitamin D group, and 22 cases in the high vitamin D group. The mean age of the population study was 56 years. Thirty-four patients had severe clinical outcomes. The distribution of this group was as follows 21 patients in the insufficient vitamin D group (16.5%), eight patients in the normal vitamin D group (15.1%), and five patients in the high vitamin D group (22.7%); P = 0.74. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of mortality rate (P = 0.46). Moreover, the mean of leukocytes (mean ± SD = 6873.5 ± 4236.2), ESR (mean ± SD = 38.42 ± 26.7), and CPK-MB (mean ± SD = 63 ± 140.7) were higher in the insufficient vitamin D group, but it was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The finding of the present study showed that vitamin D could not make a significant difference in cardiovascular systems, laboratory results, and severity of the disease in COVID-19 patients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vitamin D Deficiency / Cardiovascular System / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans / Middle aged Language: English Journal: BMC Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12879-022-07438-8

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vitamin D Deficiency / Cardiovascular System / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans / Middle aged Language: English Journal: BMC Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12879-022-07438-8