Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between "Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding".
Arun, Lily; Soumya, S V; Altaf, Syed Khalid; Shankar, S; Murali, Kruthika; Panwar, Vasim Raja.
  • Arun L; Department of Dental and Oral Surgery, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Soumya SV; Department of Dental and Oral Surgery II, Christian Medical College and Hospital, The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Altaf SK; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopeadics, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Shankar S; Department of Public Health Dentistry, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Murali K; Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Panwar VR; Department of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Rajasthan Dental College & Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 14(Suppl 1): S698-S701, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1954398
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The novel COVID-19 which spread's primarily through oral and nasal passage poses a major threat of spread during dental treatments. It is important for dental practitioners to use minimal aerosol techniques. The aim of this study is to compare the time taken, efficiency and aerosol generated between modified and conventional technique (CT) of bracket bonding.

Methods:

This study includes 40 patients who required complete orthodontic treatment. In all 40 patients, one of the arches was bonded with modified technique (MT) and the opposing with CT. The time taken to prepare tooth in both the techniques were accessed. The efficiency of bond was seen over a period of 6 months. The amount of aerosol particulate matter generated during CT and MT was observed using a laser air quality monitor.

Conclusion:

There is no significant difference in the bond failure and time taken between both the techniques. The aerosol generated in MT was minimal or almost negligible when compared to the use of CT.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jpbs.jpbs_868_21

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jpbs.jpbs_868_21