Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Predictors of human-infective RNA virus discovery in the United States, China, and Africa, an ecological study.
Zhang, Feifei; Chase-Topping, Margo; Guo, Chuan-Guo; Woolhouse, Mark E J.
  • Zhang F; Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Chase-Topping M; Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Guo CG; Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Woolhouse MEJ; Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Elife ; 112022 06 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1954753
ABSTRACT

Background:

The variation in the pathogen type as well as the spatial heterogeneity of predictors make the generality of any associations with pathogen discovery debatable. Our previous work confirmed that the association of a group of predictors differed across different types of RNA viruses, yet there have been no previous comparisons of the specific predictors for RNA virus discovery in different regions. The aim of the current study was to close the gap by investigating whether predictors of discovery rates within three regions-the United States, China, and Africa-differ from one another and from those at the global level.

Methods:

Based on a comprehensive list of human-infective RNA viruses, we collated published data on first discovery of each species in each region. We used a Poisson boosted regression tree (BRT) model to examine the relationship between virus discovery and 33 predictors representing climate, socio-economics, land use, and biodiversity across each region separately. The discovery probability in three regions in 2010-2019 was mapped using the fitted models and historical predictors.

Results:

The numbers of human-infective virus species discovered in the United States, China, and Africa up to 2019 were 95, 80, and 107 respectively, with China lagging behind the other two regions. In each region, discoveries were clustered in hotspots. BRT modelling suggested that in all three regions RNA virus discovery was better predicted by land use and socio-economic variables than climatic variables and biodiversity, although the relative importance of these predictors varied by region. Map of virus discovery probability in 2010-2019 indicated several new hotspots outside historical high-risk areas. Most new virus species since 2010 in each region (6/6 in the United States, 19/19 in China, 12/19 in Africa) were discovered in high-risk areas as predicted by our model.

Conclusions:

The drivers of spatiotemporal variation in virus discovery rates vary in different regions of the world. Within regions virus discovery is driven mainly by land-use and socio-economic variables; climate and biodiversity variables are consistently less important predictors than at a global scale. Potential new discovery hotspots in 2010-2019 are identified. Results from the study could guide active surveillance for new human-infective viruses in local high-risk areas.

Funding:

FFZ is funded by the Darwin Trust of Edinburgh (https//darwintrust.bio.ed.ac.uk/). MEJW has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 874735 (VEO) (https//www.veo-europe.eu/).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: RNA Viruses / Viruses Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa / North America Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: ELife.72123

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: RNA Viruses / Viruses Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa / North America Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: ELife.72123