Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Personal and contextual determinants of COVID-19 vaccination intention: a vignette study.
Morbée, Sofie; Waterschoot, Joachim; Yzerbyt, Vincent; Klein, Olivier; Luminet, Olivier; Schmitz, Mathias; Van den Bergh, Omer; Van Oost, Pascaline; De Craene, Silke; Vansteenkiste, Maarten.
  • Morbée S; Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Waterschoot J; Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Yzerbyt V; Institute for Research in Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Klein O; Faculty of Psychological Sciences and Education, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Luminet O; Institute for Research in Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Schmitz M; Institute for Research in Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Van den Bergh O; Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Van Oost P; Institute for Research in Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • De Craene S; Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Vansteenkiste M; Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(10): 1475-1485, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1956520
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This vignette study explores which factors contribute to higher COVID-19 vaccination intentions.

METHODS:

Between the 4th-11 January 2021, we recruited 15,901 Belgian citizens (Mage = 50.11 years, range 18-100) through convenience sampling to participate in a vignette study. In each vignette, we manipulated contextual determinants consisting of different factors. Each participant rated six vignettes in terms of the outcomes 'vaccination intention' and 'recommendation to others.' Finally, we explored the benefits of tailored communication by examining whether these ratings depended upon citizens' initial motives for vaccination.

RESULTS:

Participants are most likely to accept a vaccine when they expect no or only small side effects, when the vaccine offers a 95% protection, and when people can no longer infect others (p < 0.001). The possibility to receive the vaccine at home or at the GP's office, highlighting that most citizens are willing to get vaccinated, and emphasizing the protective benefits for others yielded additional positive effects (p < 0.001). Results showed that tailored communication has a small but significant effect, especially for individuals high on distrust-based amotivation (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION:

In addition to vaccine characteristics, there is room for policymakers to respond to those determinants that fall under their control and can thus be highlighted within communication campaigns.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines Journal subject: Allergy and Immunology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 14760584.2022.2105212

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines Journal subject: Allergy and Immunology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 14760584.2022.2105212