Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Paradoxical Positioning: Does "Head Up" Always Improve Mechanics and Lung Protection?
Selickman, John; Crooke, Philip S; Tawfik, Pierre; Dries, David J; Gattinoni, Luciano; Marini, John J.
  • Selickman J; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Crooke PS; Department of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  • Tawfik P; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Dries DJ; Department of Surgery, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN.
  • Gattinoni L; Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Marini JJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Crit Care Med ; 50(11): 1599-1606, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1958556
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Head-elevated body positioning, a default clinical practice, predictably increases end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure and aerated lung volume. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), however, the net effect of such vertical inclination on tidal mechanics depends upon whether lung recruitment or overdistension predominates. We hypothesized that in moderate to severe ARDS, bed inclination toward vertical unloads the chest wall but adversely affects overall respiratory system compliance (C rs ).

DESIGN:

Prospective physiologic study.

SETTING:

Two medical ICUs in the United States. PATIENTS Seventeen patients with ARDS, predominantly moderate to severe. INTERVENTION Patients were ventilated passively by volume control. We measured airway pressures at baseline (noninclined) and following bed inclination toward vertical by an additional 15°. At baseline and following inclination, we manually loaded the chest wall to determine if C rs increased or paradoxically declined, suggestive of end-tidal overdistension. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Inclination resulted in a higher plateau pressure (supineΔ 2.8 ± 3.3 cm H 2 O [ p = 0.01]; proneΔ 3.3 ± 2.5 cm H 2 O [ p = 0.004]), higher driving pressure (supineΔ 2.9 ± 3.3 cm H 2 O [ p = 0.01]; proneΔ 3.3 ± 2.8 cm H 2 O [ p = 0.007]), and lower C rs (supine Δ 3.4 ± 3.7 mL/cm H 2 O [ p = 0.01]; proneΔ 3.1 ± 3.2 mL/cm H 2 O [ p = 0.02]). Following inclination, manual loading of the chest wall restored C rs and driving pressure to baseline (preinclination) values.

CONCLUSIONS:

In advanced ARDS, bed inclination toward vertical adversely affects C rs and therefore affects the numerical values for plateau and driving tidal pressures commonly targeted in lung protective strategies. These changes are fully reversed with manual loading of the chest wall, suggestive of end-tidal overdistension in the upright position. Body inclination should be considered a modifiable determinant of transpulmonary pressure and lung protection, directionally similar to tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Positive-Pressure Respiration Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Crit Care Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ccm.0000000000005631

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Positive-Pressure Respiration Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Crit Care Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ccm.0000000000005631