Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Pregnant at the start of the pandemic: a content analysis of COVID-19-related posts on online pregnancy discussion boards.
Choi, Rebekah; Nagappan, Ashwini; Kopyto, Deena; Wexler, Anna.
  • Choi R; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Nagappan A; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Kopyto D; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Wexler A; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. awex@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 493, 2022 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1962773
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A growing body of evidence indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic has had detrimental mental health effects for pregnant women. However, little is known about the specific stressors that increased anxiety for pregnant women at the start of the pandemic. The present study aimed to better understand the concerns of pregnant women during the beginning COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing content posted during the month of March 2020 on online pregnancy message boards hosted on WhatToExpect.com.

METHODS:

All posts published between March 1-31, 2020 on nine different due-date specific WhatToExpect.com message boards were reviewed for COVID-19 relevance. Posts mentioning COVID-19 or its direct effects (e.g., "quarantine" or "stay-at-home order") were included in our final sample. Data were coded by three authors according to a codebook developed inductively by all four authors. Posts were analyzed by overall frequency of appearance, by trimester, and temporally across the month of March 2020.

RESULTS:

Across the 5,541 posts included in our final sample, the most common topics were fear of COVID-19 exposure, concerns with labor and delivery, navigating social interactions, and disruptions to prenatal care. The most dominant topics by trimester were disruptions to prenatal care (first trimester), fear of COVID-19 exposure (second trimester), and concerns about labor and delivery (third trimester).

CONCLUSION:

Our findings add to prior literature by demonstrating the salience of social concerns, which was the third largest COVID-19 topic in our sample. Emotional distress was most salient with regard to restrictions on birthing partners, but was apparent in everything from disruptions to pregnancy announcements, to cancelled baby showers, and limitations on newborn visitors. Given that anxiety during pregnancy is associated with worse maternal-fetal health outcomes, in the early stages of future pandemics healthcare providers should focus not only on strictly health-related concerns expressed by pregnant women, but also more broadly on other sources of anxiety that may be impacting the well-being and mental health of their patients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Infant, Newborn / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Journal subject: Obstetrics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12884-022-04802-z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Infant, Newborn / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Journal subject: Obstetrics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12884-022-04802-z