Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Psychological distress and morbidity of family members experiencing virtual visiting in intensive care during COVID-19: an observational cohort study.
Rose, Louise; Cook, Amelia; Onwumere, Juliana; Terblanche, Ella; Pattison, Natalie; Metaxa, Victoria; Meyer, Joel.
  • Rose L; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, Rm 1.13, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Rd, London, SE1 8WA, UK. louise.rose@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Cook A; Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Onwumere J; Department of Psychology at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Terblanche E; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, Rm 1.13, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Rd, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
  • Pattison N; University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK.
  • Metaxa V; East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK.
  • Meyer J; King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Intensive Care Med ; 48(9): 1156-1164, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1966121
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, intensive care units (ICUs) around the world introduced virtual visiting to mediate the psychological impact of in-person visiting restrictions. Our objective was to evaluate levels of distress, depression, anxiety, and stress among family members experiencing virtual visits.

METHODS:

Multi-centre prospective observational study recruiting adult family members of critically ill patients in the United Kingdom (UK) using a bespoke virtual visiting solution (aTouchAway). We recruited participants and administered validated questionnaires digitally via their aTouchAway account. Prior to first virtual visit, participants completed the Distress Thermometer (score range 0-10) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS)-21. Following first and subsequent virtual visits, participants repeated the Distress Thermometer and completed the Discrete Emotions Questionnaire.

RESULTS:

We recruited 2166 adult family members of ICU patients in 37 UK hospitals. Most were grown up children (33%) or spouses/partners (23%). Most (91%) were ≤ 65 years. Mean (SD) pre-virtual-visit Distress Thermometer score was 7 (2.6) with 1349/2153 (62%) reporting severe distress. Pre-visit Distress Thermometer scores were associated with relationship type (spouse/partner OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.27-2.12) but not family member age, or length of ICU stay. Mean (SD) post-visit Distress Thermometer score provided by 762 (35%) participants was 1.6 (3.2) points lower than pre-visit (P < 0.001). Of participants experiencing multiple visits, 22% continued to report severe distress. Median (IQR) pre-visit DASS-21 score was 18 (2-42) (1754 participants). Severe-to-extremely severe depression, anxiety, or stress were reported by 249 (14%), 321 (18%), and 165 (9%) participants, respectively. Participants reported a range of emotions with reassurance being the most common, anger being the least.

CONCLUSION:

Family members exposed to COVID-19 pandemic ICU visiting restrictions experienced severe distress. One fifth of family members reported severe-to-extremely sever anxiety or depression. Distress score magnitude and prevalence of severe distress decreased after undertaking one or more virtual visits.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychological Distress / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Intensive Care Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00134-022-06824-9

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychological Distress / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Intensive Care Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00134-022-06824-9