Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A longitudinal study on PRRSV detection in swine herds with different demographics and PRRSV management strategies.
Campler, Magnus R; Cheng, Ting-Yu; Schroeder, Declan C; Yang, M; Mor, Sunil K; Ferreira, Juliana B; Arruda, Andréia G.
  • Campler MR; Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Cheng TY; Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Schroeder DC; Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
  • Yang M; Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
  • Mor SK; Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
  • Ferreira JB; Department of Population Health & Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
  • Arruda AG; Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 69(4): e1005-e1014, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968197
ABSTRACT
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) has been one of the major health-related concerns in the swine production industry. Through its rapid transmission and mutation, the simultaneous circulation of multiple PRRSV strains can be a challenge in PRRSV diagnostic, control and surveillance. The objective of this longitudinal study was to describe the temporal detection of PRRSV in swine farms with different production types and PRRS management strategies. Tonsil scraping (n = 344) samples were collected from three breeding and two growing herds for approximately one year. In addition, processing fluids (n = 216) were obtained from piglet processing batches within the three breeding farms while pen-based oral fluids (n = 125) were collected in the two growing pig farms. Viral RNA extraction and reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were conducted for all samples. The sample positivity threshold was set at quantification cycle (Cq) of ≤ 37. Statistical analyses were performed using generalized linear modelling and post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni adjustments using R statistical software. The results suggested a higher probability of detection in processing fluids compared to tonsil scraping specimens [odds ratio (OR) = 3.86; p = .096] in breeding farms whereas oral fluids were outperformed by tonsil scrapings (OR = 0.26; p < .01) in growing pig farms. The results described herein may lead to an improvement in PRRSV diagnostic and surveillance by selecting proper specimens.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Swine Diseases / Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus / Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Transbound Emerg Dis Journal subject: Veterinary Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Swine Diseases / Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus / Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Transbound Emerg Dis Journal subject: Veterinary Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article