Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.
Xu, Zhixiao; Guo, Kun; Chu, Weiwei; Lou, Jingwen; Chen, Chengshui.
  • Xu Z; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Guo K; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Chu W; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Lou J; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Chen C; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol ; 10: 903426, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968989
ABSTRACT

Background:

The ability to assess adverse outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) could improve clinical decision-making to enhance clinical practice, but the studies remain insufficient, and similarly, few machine learning (ML) models have been developed.

Objective:

We aimed to explore the effectiveness of predicting adverse outcomes in CAP through ML models.

Methods:

A total of 2,302 adults with CAP who were prospectively recruited between January 2012 and March 2015 across three cities in South America were extracted from DryadData. After a 7030 training set test set split of the data, nine ML algorithms were executed and their diagnostic accuracy was measured mainly by the area under the curve (AUC). The nine ML algorithms included decision trees, random forests, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machines, Naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbors, ridge regression, logistic regression without regularization, and neural networks. The adverse outcomes included hospital admission, mortality, ICU admission, and one-year post-enrollment status.

Results:

The XGBoost algorithm had the best performance in predicting hospital admission. Its AUC reached 0.921, and accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were better than those of other models. In the prediction of ICU admission, a model trained with the XGBoost algorithm showed the best performance with AUC 0.801. XGBoost algorithm also did a good job at predicting one-year post-enrollment status. The results of AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score indicated the algorithm had high accuracy and precision. In addition, the best performance was seen by the neural network algorithm when predicting death (AUC 0.831).

Conclusions:

ML algorithms, particularly the XGBoost algorithm, were feasible and effective in predicting adverse outcomes of CAP patients. The ML models based on available common clinical features had great potential to guide individual treatment and subsequent clinical decisions.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fbioe.2022.903426

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fbioe.2022.903426