Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Trends in Utilization of Electronic Consultations Associated With Patient Payer and Language Among US Academic Medical Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Arora, Anita; Fekieta, Renee; Nouri, Zakia; Carder, Danielle; Colgan, Megan M; Fuhlbrigge, Anne; Jackson, Sara L; Collins, Samuel; Gleason, Nathaniel; Chen, Julia.
  • Arora A; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Fekieta R; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Nouri Z; Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Carder D; Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Colgan MM; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Fuhlbrigge A; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
  • Jackson SL; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
  • Collins S; University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
  • Gleason N; University of California, San Francisco.
  • Chen J; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(7): e2224628, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1971177
ABSTRACT
Importance Electronic consultations (eConsultations) are increasingly used to obtain specialist guidance, avoiding unnecessary face-to-face patient visits for certain clinical questions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, when in-person care was limited, eConsultations may have helped clinicians obtain specialist input to guide patient care.

Objective:

To understand how the use of eConsultations changed during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether trends in eConsultation utilization differed based on patient's payer and primary language. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 6 academic medical centers in the United States, all participating in the Association of American Colleges Coordinating Optimal Referral Experiences program. Participants included adult patients who had an outpatient visit, referral, or eConsultation during the study period. Data were analyzed from June 4, 2019, to July 28, 2020. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

The primary outcome was the eConsultation proportion of specialty contact, defined as the number of completed eConsultations divided by the sum of the number of completed eConsultations and specialty referrals, expressed as a percentage. eConsultation percentages of specialty contact were further stratified by payer type and language. Payers included commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, self-pay or uninsured, and other. Primary language included English and non-English languages.

Results:

A total of 14 545 completed eConsultations and 189 776 referrals were included. More eConsultations were completed for English-speaking patients (11 363 eConsultations [95.0%]) than non-English-speaking patients (597 eConsultations [5.0%]). Patients with commercial insurance represented the highest number of completed eConsultations (8848 eConsultations [60.8%]) followed by Medicare (3891 eConsultations [26.8%]), Medicaid (930 eConsultations [6.4%]), other insurance (745 eConsultations [5.1%]), and self-pay or no insurance (131 eConsultations [0.9%]). At the start of the pandemic, across all academic medical centers, the percentage of specialty contact conducted via eConsultation significantly increased by 6.21% (95% CI, 4.97%-7.44%; P < .001). When stratified by payer and language, the percentage of specialty contact conducted via eConsultation significantly increased at the beginning of the pandemic for both English-speaking patients (change, 6.09% (95% CI, 4.82% to 7.37%; P < .001) and non-English-speaking patients (change, 8.48% [95% CI, 5.79% to 11.16%]; P < .001) and for all payers, except self-pay and uninsured patients (change, -0.21% [95% CI, [-1.35% to 0.92%]; P = .70). Conclusions and Relevance This retrospective cohort study found that eConsultations provided an accessible mechanism for clinicians to receive specialist input when in-person care was limited.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Remote Consultation / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: JAMA Netw Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Remote Consultation / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: JAMA Netw Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article