Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluating the Importance of Sub-Internships on the 2022 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match During Continued COVID-19 Regulations.
Sinik, Lauren M; Egan, Katie G; Bagwell, Alexis K; Nauta, Allison C; Butterworth, James A.
  • Sinik LM; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
  • Egan KG; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
  • Bagwell AK; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Nauta AC; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Butterworth JA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: jbutterworth@kumc.edu.
J Surg Educ ; 79(6): 1435-1440, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1983577
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Following the 2021 integrated plastic surgery match, we found a significant increase in home match rates and decrease in match rate for students without a home plastic surgery program with the elimination of visiting sub-internships and the initiation of virtual interviewing. With the return of visiting sub-internships in the 2022 match cycle, we hypothesize that these rates will approach values more consistent with historical controls.

DESIGN:

Program match data was obtained from posts to residency program Instagram pages and posts associated with the hashtag #PRSMatch2022. Data on visiting sub-internship matches was obtained from a publicly available Google Sheet with applicant contributors. The Chi square test was used to assess for differences.

SETTING:

Medical schools and plastic surgery programs were categorized into west, midwest, south, and northeast regions.

PARTICIPANTS:

Matched applicants to integrated plastic surgery residency programs.

RESULTS:

In total, 192 of 194 (99%) of applicants matched to integrated plastic surgery residency positions were identified. The match rate for applicants without an affiliated plastic surgery program (31.3%) increased from 2021 (p = 0.03) and returned to a level consistent with historical controls (p = 0.38). Similarly, the home program match rate (15.1%) and match rate for applicants from Top 40 medical schools (34.2%) decreased from 2021, returning to pre-pandemic levels (p = 0.63, p = 0.12). Finally, regional match preferences remained generally consistent with historical controls, apart from a higher proportion of northeast applicants matching to programs in the northeast (72.5%, p = 0.04), and a lower proportion of west applicants matching to programs in the west (26.3%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS:

The 2022 integrated plastic surgery match cycle saw a reversal of many of the changes to match rates seen in the 2021 cycle. These changes may be due to the reintroduction of visiting sub-internships following updates in COVID-19 policies.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgery, Plastic / Plastic Surgery Procedures / COVID-19 / Internship and Residency Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Surg Educ Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgery, Plastic / Plastic Surgery Procedures / COVID-19 / Internship and Residency Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Surg Educ Year: 2022 Document Type: Article