Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia.
Crooks, Kristy; Taylor, Kylie; Law, Charlee; Campbell, Sandra; Miller, Adrian.
  • Crooks K; Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia kristy.crooks@students.cdu.edu.au.
  • Taylor K; Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Law C; Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Campbell S; Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Miller A; College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
BMJ Glob Health ; 7(8)2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1986361
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

First Nations Peoples of Australia have not been included in the development nor prioritised in pre-2009 pandemic plans despite being a priority population in Australian health policy. Marginalised groups experience amplified barriers and systemic disadvantage in emergencies, however, their voices have not been heard in past pandemic responses. Through effective engagement with disadvantaged and oppressed groups, health authorities can gain a deeper understanding of how to design and implement pandemic control strategies. There have been limited studies with First Nations Peoples that has focused on pandemic planning and response strategies. Deliberative inclusive approaches such as citizens juries have been a way to uncover public perceptions.

METHODS:

Qualitative thematic research methods were used to conduct the study. We convened five First Nations Community Panels in three locations in Australia between 2019 and 2020. We used an Indigenist research approach, community-based Participatory Action Research framework and 'yarning' to understand whether Community Panels were an acceptable and appropriate way of engaging First Nations Peoples. Forty First Nations participants were purposively recruited through local and cultural networks. Panels heard evidence supporting various pandemic response strategies, and cross-questioned public health experts.

RESULTS:

All 40 participants from the 5 panels verbally indicated strong support of the Community Panels approach as an effective way of engaging First Nations Peoples in making decisions about pandemic planning and response strategies. The main theme of 'respect' centred on the overarching principle that First Nations Peoples are important in the context of continuation of culture and ongoing political resistance.

CONCLUSION:

First Nations Community Panels are a way of enabling active participation of First Nations peoples, increasing knowledge and understanding, and a way for government and policymakers to respectfully listen to First Nations opinions and values.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Community-Based Participatory Research / Pandemics Type of study: Experimental Studies / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjgh-2022-009114

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Community-Based Participatory Research / Pandemics Type of study: Experimental Studies / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjgh-2022-009114