Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Oral Lesions Following Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Systematic Review.
Di Spirito, Federica; Amato, Alessandra; Di Palo, Maria Pia; Contaldo, Maria; D'Ambrosio, Francesco; Lo Giudice, Roberto; Amato, Massimo.
  • Di Spirito F; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy.
  • Amato A; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.
  • Di Palo MP; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy.
  • Contaldo M; Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialities, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Naples, Italy.
  • D'Ambrosio F; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy.
  • Lo Giudice R; Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University Hospital "G. Martino" of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98123 Messina, Italy.
  • Amato M; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(16)2022 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1987819
ABSTRACT
Increasing evidence relate anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations to orofacial adverse reactions, therefore, the present systematic review aimed to evaluate primary oral lesions diagnosed in adult subjects, following the WHO Emergency Use Listing approved and EMA authorized vaccines, also in relation to cases' age, gender, comorbidities, and history of COVID-19, and in relation to vaccine type and doses. The study protocol, registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022339032) and compliant with the PRISMA statement, included an electronic search across Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, BioMed Central databases, and PROSPERO, ended on 18 June 2022 and succeeded by a manual search, an independent data extraction, and arisk of bias evaluation through ROBINS-I tool. Qualitatively synthesized data from the 13studies included showed an overall low prevalence (16 cases), though higher in females (68.8%), of oral lesions, mainly erosions and ulcers (34.5%). Nine cases were diagnosed following Pfizer-BioNTech, two Moderna, and one AstraZeneca, Serum Institute of India, Sinopharm, and Johnson&Johnson vaccines, respectively; specifically, eight after the first dose and seven after the second. In one case, vaccine type and dose were not specified. Considering newly developing vaccines, presented findings may be updated and further studies needed to highlight factors affecting oral lesion occurrence and specific macro-microscopic phenotypes in relation to cases' and vaccines' characteristics.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph191610228

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph191610228