Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The effectiveness of COVID-19 testing and contact tracing in a US city.
Wang, Xutong; Du, Zhanwei; James, Emily; Fox, Spencer J; Lachmann, Michael; Meyers, Lauren Ancel; Bhavnani, Darlene.
  • Wang X; Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
  • Du Z; Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
  • James E; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Fox SJ; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health, Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Lachmann M; Information Technology Project Management Office, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
  • Meyers LA; Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
  • Bhavnani D; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(34): e2200652119, 2022 08 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1991763
ABSTRACT
Although testing, contact tracing, and case isolation programs can mitigate COVID-19 transmission and allow the relaxation of social distancing measures, few countries worldwide have succeeded in scaling such efforts to levels that suppress spread. The efficacy of test-trace-isolate likely depends on the speed and extent of follow-up and the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the community. Here, we use a granular model of COVID-19 transmission to estimate the public health impacts of test-trace-isolate programs across a range of programmatic and epidemiological scenarios, based on testing and contact tracing data collected on a university campus and surrounding community in Austin, TX, between October 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021. The median time between specimen collection from a symptomatic case and quarantine of a traced contact was 2 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2 to 3) on campus and 5 days (IQR 3 to 8) in the community. Assuming a reproduction number of 1.2, we found that detection of 40% of all symptomatic cases followed by isolation is expected to avert 39% (IQR 30% to 45%) of COVID-19 cases. Contact tracing is expected to increase the cases averted to 53% (IQR 42% to 58%) or 40% (32% to 47%), assuming the 2- and 5-day delays estimated on campus and in the community, respectively. In a tracing-accelerated scenario, in which 75% of contacts are notified the day after specimen collection, cases averted increase to 68% (IQR 55% to 72%). An accelerated contact tracing program leveraging rapid testing and electronic reporting of test results can significantly curtail local COVID-19 transmission.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Contact Tracing / COVID-19 Testing / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Contact Tracing / COVID-19 Testing / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Year: 2022 Document Type: Article