Your browser doesn't support javascript.
An online feedback system for laparoscopic training during the COVID-19 pandemic: evaluation from the trainer perspective.
Kuboki, Daigo; Kawahira, Hiroshi; Maeda, Yoshitaka; Oiwa, Kosuke; Unoki, Teruhiko; Lefor, Alan Kawarai; Sata, Naohiro.
  • Kuboki D; Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Kawahira H; Department of Surgery, Kitaibaraki City Hospital, 1050, Sekimotoshimo, Sekinami-cho, Kitaibaraki-shi, Ibaraki, Japan.
  • Maeda Y; Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Oiwa K; Medical Simulation Center, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Unoki T; Medical Simulation Center, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Lefor AK; Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, Aoyama Gakuin University, 5-10-1, Fuchinobe, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Sata N; College of Foreign Studies, Kansai Gaidai University, 16-1, Nakamiyahigashino-cho, Hirakata-shi, Osaka, Japan.
Heliyon ; 8(8): e10303, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1996191
ABSTRACT

Objective:

A system to provide feedback for laparoscopic training using an online conferencing system during the COVID-19 pandemic was developed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate this system from the trainer perspective.

Design:

A procedural feedback system using an online conferencing system was devised.

Setting:

Surgical training was observed using an online conferencing system (Zoom). Feedback was provided while viewing suture videos which are, as a feature of this system, pre-recorded. Feedback was then recorded. Trainer comments were then converted into text, summarized as feedback items, and sorted by suture phase which facilitates reflection. Trainers completed a questionnaire concerning the usability of the online feedback session.

Results:

Eleven trainers were selected. Physicians had an average experience of 21.9 ± 5.9 years (mean ± standard deviation). The total number of feedback items obtained by classifying each phase was 32. Based on questionnaire results, 91% of trainers were accustomed to the use of Zoom, and 100% felt that online procedural education was useful. In questions regarding system effectiveness, more than 70% of trainers answered positively to all questions, and in questions about efficiency, more than 70% of trainers answered positively. Only 55% of the trainers felt that this system was easy to use, but 91% were satisfied as trainers.

Conclusions:

The results of the questionnaire suggest that this system has high usability for training. This online system could be a useful tool for providing feedback in situations where face-to-face education is difficult.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Heliyon Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.heliyon.2022.e10303

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Heliyon Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.heliyon.2022.e10303