Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effectiveness of an intervention for reducing sitting time and improving health in office workers: three arm cluster randomised controlled trial.
Edwardson, Charlotte L; Biddle, Stuart J H; Clemes, Stacy A; Davies, Melanie J; Dunstan, David W; Eborall, Helen; Granat, Malcolm H; Gray, Laura J; Healy, Genevieve N; Jaicim, Nishal Bhupendra; Lawton, Sarah; Maylor, Benjamin D; Munir, Fehmidah; Richardson, Gerry; Yates, Thomas; Clarke-Cornwell, Alexandra M.
  • Edwardson CL; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK ce95@le.ac.uk.
  • Biddle SJH; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
  • Clemes SA; Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia.
  • Davies MJ; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
  • Dunstan DW; School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicester, UK.
  • Eborall H; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
  • Granat MH; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
  • Gray LJ; Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Healy GN; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Jaicim NB; Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, The Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Lawton S; Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Maylor BD; Deanery of Molecular, Genetic and Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
  • Munir F; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
  • Richardson G; Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Yates T; School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Clarke-Cornwell AM; The Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
BMJ ; 378: e069288, 2022 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2001807
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention, with and without a height adjustable desk, on daily sitting time, and to investigate the relative effectiveness of the two interventions, and the effectiveness of both interventions on physical behaviours and physical, biochemical, psychological, and work related health and performance outcomes.

DESIGN:

Cluster three arm randomised controlled trial with follow-up at three and 12 months.

SETTING:

Local government councils in Leicester, Liverpool, and Greater Manchester, UK.

PARTICIPANTS:

78 clusters including 756 desk based employees in defined offices, departments, or teams from two councils in Leicester, three in Greater Manchester, and one in Liverpool.

INTERVENTIONS:

Clusters were randomised to one of three conditions the SMART Work and Life (SWAL) intervention, the SWAL intervention with a height adjustable desk (SWAL plus desk), or control (usual practice). MAIN OUTCOMES

MEASURES:

The primary outcome measure was daily sitting time, assessed by accelerometry, at 12 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were accelerometer assessed sitting, prolonged sitting, standing and stepping time, and physical activity calculated over any valid day, work hours, workdays, and non-workdays, self-reported lifestyle behaviours, musculoskeletal problems, cardiometabolic health markers, work related health and performance, fatigue, and psychological measures.

RESULTS:

Mean age of participants was 44.7 years, 72.4% (n=547) were women, and 74.9% (n=566) were white. Daily sitting time at 12 months was significantly lower in the intervention groups (SWAL -22.2 min/day, 95% confidence interval -38.8 to -5.7 min/day, P=0.003; SWAL plus desk -63.7 min/day, -80.1 to -47.4 min/day, P<0.001) compared with the control group. The SWAL plus desk intervention was found to be more effective than SWAL at changing sitting time (-41.7 min/day, -56.3 to -27.0 min/day, P<0.001). Favourable differences in sitting and prolonged sitting time at three and 12 month follow-ups for both intervention groups and for standing time for the SWAL plus desk group were observed during work hours and on workdays. Both intervention groups were associated with small improvements in stress, wellbeing, and vigour, and the SWAL plus desk group was associated with improvements in pain in the lower extremity, social norms for sitting and standing at work, and support.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both SWAL and SWAL plus desk were associated with a reduction in sitting time, although the addition of a height adjustable desk was found to be threefold more effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN11618007.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Health / Sitting Position Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: BMJ Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmj-2021-069288

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Health / Sitting Position Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: BMJ Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmj-2021-069288