Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review.
Wolf, Sarah; Zechmeister-Koss, Ingrid; Erdös, Judit.
  • Wolf S; Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH, Vienna, Austria. sarah.wolf@aihta.at.
  • Zechmeister-Koss I; Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
  • Erdös J; Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 1076, 2022 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2002170
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Individuals of all ages and with all degrees of severity of the coronavirus disease (COVID) can suffer from persisting or reappearing symptoms called long COVID. Long COVID involves various symptoms, such as shortness of breath, fatigue, or organ damage. The growing number of long COVID cases places a burden on the patients and the broader economy and, hence, has gained more weight in political decisions. This scoping review aimed to give an overview of recommendations about possible long COVID healthcare pathways and requirements regarding decision-making and communication for healthcare professionals.

METHODS:

A systematic search in four databases and biweekly update-hand searches were conducted. In addition to guidelines and reviews, expert opinions in consensus statements or clinical perspectives were also considered. Data were systematically extracted and subsequently narratively and graphically summarised.

RESULTS:

Fourteen references, five guidelines, four reviews, one consensus paper, and four clinical perspectives were included. The evidence recommended that most long COVID-related healthcare should be in primary care. Patients with complex symptoms should be referred to specialized long COVID outpatient assessment clinics. In contrast, patients with one dominant symptom should be directed to the respective specialist for a second assessment. Depending on the patients' needs, further referral options include, e.g. rehabilitation or non-medical health services. Self-management and good communication between healthcare professionals and patients are crucial aspects of the long COVID management recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS:

The quality of the included guidelines and reviews is limited in the methods applied due to the novelty of this topic and the associated urgency for research. Hence, an update review with more rigorous data is recommended. Furthermore, the systematic collection of real-world data on long COVID surveillance needs to be set up soon to gather further information on the duration and severity of long COVID and thereby facilitate long COVID care planning.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronavirus Infections / Coronavirus / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-022-08384-6

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronavirus Infections / Coronavirus / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-022-08384-6