Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.
Kogel, Alexander; Hepp, Pierre; Stegmann, Tina; Tünnemann-Tarr, Adrienn; Falz, Roberto; Fischer, Patrick; Mahfoud, Felix; Laufs, Ulrich; Fikenzer, Sven.
  • Kogel A; Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Hepp P; Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Stegmann T; Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Tünnemann-Tarr A; Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Falz R; Institute of Sport Medicine and Prevention, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Fischer P; Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg (Saar), Germany.
  • Mahfoud F; Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg (Saar), Germany.
  • Laufs U; Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Fikenzer S; Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0269470, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2002295
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Surgical and FFP2 masks are recommended to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The cardiopulmonary effects of facemasks in patients with chronic heart failure are unknown. This prospective, cross-over study quantified the effects of wearing no mask (nm), surgical mask (sm), and FFP2 mask (ffpm) in patients with stable heart failure.

METHODS:

12 patients with clinically stable chronic heart failure (HF) (age 63.8±12 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 43.8±11%, NTProBNP 573±567 pg/ml) underwent spiroergometry with and without masks in a randomized sequence. Comfort/discomfort was assessed using a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS:

Maximum power was reduced with both types of masks (nm 108.3 W vs. sm 101.2 W vs. ffpm 95.6 W, p<0.01). Maximum respiratory oxygen uptake (1499ml/min vs. 1481 ml/min vs. 1300 ml/min, p = 0.95 and <0.01), peak ventilation (62.1 l/min vs. 56.4 l/min vs. 50.3 l/min, p = 0.15 and p<0.05) and O2-pulse (11.6 ml/beat vs. 11.8 ml/beat vs. 10.6 ml/beat, p = 0.87 and p<0.01) were significantly changed with ffpm but not sm. Discomfort was moderately but significantly increased (nm 1.6 vs. sm 3.4 vs. ffpm 4.4, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Both surgical and FFP masks reduce exercise capacity in heart failure patients, while FFP2 masks reduce oxygen uptake and peak ventilation. This reduction in cardiopulmonary performance should be considered in heart failure patients whose daily life activities are often just as challenging as exercise is for healthy adults.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Heart Failure Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0269470

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Heart Failure Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0269470