Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Return to the Reading Room: Implementation of a Hybrid Radiology Clerkship Model after Emergent Conversion to Remote Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Musick, Alexis; Malhotra, Deeksha; French, Robert; Carrico, Caroline; Martin, Jonathan.
  • Musick A; Duke University School of Medicine (A.M., D.M.), Durham, North Carolina.
  • Malhotra D; Duke University School of Medicine (A.M., D.M.), Durham, North Carolina.
  • French R; Department of Radiology (R.F., C.C., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, DUMC BOX 3808, 2301 Erwin Rd, Duke North, Room 1502, Durham, NC 27710. Electronic address: robert.french@duke.edu.
  • Carrico C; Department of Radiology (R.F., C.C., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, DUMC BOX 3808, 2301 Erwin Rd, Duke North, Room 1502, Durham, NC 27710.
  • Martin J; Department of Radiology (R.F., C.C., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, DUMC BOX 3808, 2301 Erwin Rd, Duke North, Room 1502, Durham, NC 27710.
Acad Radiol ; 2022 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2003783
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES:

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the virtualization of historically in-person radiology rotations for medical students. As students return to in-person clinical education, there is an opportunity to reevaluate teaching strategies and incorporate best practices from the pandemic. We describe our experience with the conversion of a four-week radiology clerkship from an in-person (IP) to remote learning (RL) to hybrid model (HM) and its impact on student performance and satisfaction. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Stratified by curriculum (Group 1 IP, Group 2 RL, Group 3 HM), student standardized final examination scores, final grades, lecture evaluation scores, and satisfaction scores were compared. Additional analysis was performed for Group 3 clinical divisions in which IP or RL models predominated.

RESULTS:

A significant decrease in mean final exam score was noted in Group 2 (p < 0.0001). Average lecture rating decreased in Group 3 compared to Group 1 (p < 0.001). Group 3 students reported improved faculty (Group 1 59, Group 2 61, Group 3 82; p < 0.001) and resident (Group 1 76.5, Group 2 68, Group 3 90; p < 0.001) teaching effectiveness. Student-reported quantity and quality of formative feedback were also highest for Group 3 (Quantity; Group 1 60.6, Group 2 74, Group 3 93; p < 0.001) (Quality; Group 1 59.1, Group 2 77, Group 3 97; p < 0.001). Group 3 subanalysis demonstrated increased student-perceived usefulness of activities within IP divisions (p < 0.01) and a decrease for RL divisions (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

A hybrid curriculum resulted in improved student satisfaction and preserved student performance after an emergent conversion to remote learning.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal subject: Radiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal subject: Radiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article