Inner Branch Endovascular Repair in Complex Secondary Aortic Intervention in Case of Abdominal and Thoraco-Abdominal Aneurysmal Progression: An Early Single Centre experience

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Aortic aneurysmal disease is an evolving pathology when treating an aortic aneurysm, we must consider the possibility of a thoraco-abdominal evolution aneurysm, which might lead to further treatments. In case of challenging anatomies (narrow aortic lumen at the level of visceral arteries, aortic wall thrombus, true lumen in an aortic dissected aneurysm, and focal aortic narrow diameter), unfavourable both for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR), an inner branched custom made device could represent a potential feasible solution. Inner branched endografts have a typical configuration that combines the advantageous characteristics of both fenestrated and side branched endografts, thus showing advantages over other custom made grafts. Our study aimed to investigate the potential role of this technique in a broad variety of aortic anatomies unfavourable for FEVAR and BEVAR, in patients who received different previous aortic treatments. Methods: In our institution, between July 2018 and July 2020, 20 consecutive patients underwent a FEVAR/BEVAR procedure to treat complex abdominal aortic aneurysm or thoracic aortic aneurysm. Nine patients who were deemed untreatable with a fenestrated/branched graft due to aortic anatomy and/or previous treatments were treated with a custom made, four inner branch E-xtra design endograft (I BEVAR). All patients were treated for a complex aortic abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aneurysm two patients were previously treated with frozen elephant trunk and TEVAR;three patients were previously treated with TEVAR;and one with TEVAR + abdominal aortic surgical treatment. Two patients received abdominal aortic surgical treatment only. The last patient was previously treated with EVAR, which was then complicated with a type 1A endoleak (EL). Five of six TEVARs were placed before BEVAR as staged procedures, to decrease spinal cord ischaemia risk. All patients had a lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage during the BEVAR procedure. In total, the bridging stents placed included 43 balloon expandable and four self-expandable stents. Results: In our experience, all cases were treated with a four inner branch endograft with a total revascularisation of 36 target vessels. Technical success was achieved in all nine cases (100%), with precise deployment of the inner branched endograft and effective engagement and bridging of all branches. Major clinical complications occurred in three (33%) patients one case of continuous veno-venous haemofiltration treatment for a transient acute renal failure in a chronic renal disease;one case of hepatic decompensation in patient with a chronic cirrhosis, which led to liver failure (Child Pugh C10, MELD 19, still under medical treatment);and one patient with a pulmonary infection disease (COVID-19 related), which then resolved. No patient suffered spinal cord ischaemia. The mean follow up was 12.8 months ± 6.79 months, with an estimated one year survival rate of 89%. One patient with a thrombophilic disorder died on postoperative day 48 as a result of multiple organ failure after acute four inner branches simultaneous occlusion. During follow up, the target vessel primary patency rate was 89%, associated with four (11%) bridging stent ELs. At 30 days, computed tomography angiography detected five BS ELs in four patients one type III BS EL (2.7%), and four type I BS ELs (11%). Re-intervention was needed in one patient (11%) with a type III and I BS EL associated with an aneurysm sac enlargement treated with bridging stent relining in the left renal artery and superior mesenteric artery. Conclusion: Our experience shows the feasibility of treating complex aortic anatomies with an inner branched graft in patients which were anatomically unfit for FEVAR/BEVAR treatment, allowing complex visceral vessels recanalisation and an adequate sealing. When a re-intervention is needed, we have to consider that previous surgical and endovascular treatments modify the aortic anatomy, and the graft deploy ent may be tougher, with a higher risk of malrotation. Inner branched endograft could be a valid option in case of complex anatomies, but long term follow up is needed.