Filter evaluation and selection for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

ABSTRACT

Particle size removal efficiencies for 0.1-1.0 µm ( PSE 0.1 - 1.0 $$ {PSE}_{0.1-1.0} $$ ) and 0.3-1.0 µm ( PSE 0.3 - 1.0 $$ {PSE}_{0.3-1.0} $$ ) diameter of Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) filters, an electrostatic enhanced air filter (EEAF), and their two-stage filtration systems were evaluated. Considering the most penetrating particle size was 0.1-0.4 µm particulate matter (PM), the PSE 0.1 - 1.0 $$ {PSE}_{0.1-1.0} $$ as an evaluation parameter deserves more attention during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the PSE 0.3 - 1.0 $$ {PSE}_{0.3-1.0} $$ . The MERV 13 filters were recommended for a single-stage filtration system because of their superior quality factor (QF) compared to MERV 6, MERV 8, MERV 11 filters, and the EEAF. Combined MERV 8 + MERV 11 filters have the highest QF compared to MERV 6 + MERV 11 filters and EEAF + MERV 11 filters; regarding 50% of PSE 0.1 - 1.0 $$ {PSE}_{0.1-1.0} $$ as the filtration requirements of two-stage filtration systems, the MERV 8 + MERV 11 filtration system can achieve this value at 1.0 m/s air velocity, while PSE 0.1 - 1.0 $$ {PSE}_{0.1-1.0} $$ values were lower than 50% at 1.5 m/s and 2.0 m/s. EEAF obtained a better PSE 0.3 - 1.0 $$ {PSE}_{0.3-1.0} $$ in the full-recirculated test rig than in the single-pass mode owing to active ionization effects when EEAF was charged by alternating current.