Your browser doesn't support javascript.
[ECMO support during the first two waves of the corona pandemic-a survey of high case volume centers in Germany]. / ECMO-Unterstützung während der ersten 2 Wellen der Coronapandemie ­ eine Umfrage an Zentren mit hohen Fallzahlen in Deutschland.
Supady, Alexander; Michels, Guido; Lepper, Philipp M; Ferrari, Markus; Wippermann, Jens; Sabashnikov, Anton; Thiele, Holger; Hennersdorf, Marcus; Lahmer, Tobias; Boeken, Udo; Gummert, Jan; Tigges, Eike; Muellenbach, Ralf M; Spangenberg, Tobias; Wengenmayer, Tobias; Staudacher, Dawid L.
  • Supady A; Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Intensivtherapie (IMIT), Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. alexander.supady@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
  • Michels G; Abteilung für Kardiologie und Angiologie I, Universitäts Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland. alexander.supady@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
  • Lepper PM; Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Universität-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. alexander.supady@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
  • Ferrari M; Klinik für Akut- und Notfallmedizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler, Eschweiler, Deutschland.
  • Wippermann J; Klinik für Innere Medizin V - Pneumologie, Allergologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
  • Sabashnikov A; Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Deutschland.
  • Thiele H; Universitätsklinik für Herz- und Thoraxchirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
  • Hennersdorf M; Herzzentrum, Klinik und Poliklinik für Herzchirurgie, herzchirurgische Intensivmedizin und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
  • Lahmer T; Herzzentrum Leipzig, Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie, Leipzig, Deutschland.
  • Boeken U; Medizinische Klinik I, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Heilbronn, Deutschland.
  • Gummert J; Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, München, Deutschland.
  • Tigges E; Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
  • Muellenbach RM; Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskularchirurgie, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Deutschland.
  • Spangenberg T; Klinik für Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
  • Wengenmayer T; Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv­, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, ECMO-Zentrum, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland.
  • Staudacher DL; Abteilung für Kardiologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 2022 Sep 08.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2007119
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

At the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, concerns were raised about sufficiency of available intensive care resources. In many places, routine interventions were postponed and criteria for the allocation of scarce resources were formulated. In Germany, some hospitals were at times seriously burdened during the course of the pandemic. Intensive care units in particular experienced a shortage of resources, which may have led to a restriction of services and a stricter indication setting for resource-intensive measures such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this work is to provide an overview of how these pressures were managed at large ECMO centers in Germany.

METHODS:

One representative of each major ECMO referral center in Germany was invited to participate in an online survey in spring 2021.

RESULTS:

Of 34 invitations that were sent out, the survey was answered by 23 participants. In all centers, routine procedures were postponed during the pandemic. Half of the centers increased the number of beds on which ECMO procedures could be offered. Nevertheless, in one-third of the centers, the start of at least one ECMO support was delayed because of a feared resource shortage. In 17% of centers, at least one patient was denied ECMO that he or she would have most likely received under prepandemic conditions.

CONCLUSION:

The results of this online survey indicate that the experienced pressures and resource constraints led some centers to be cautious about ECMO indications.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: German Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: German Year: 2022 Document Type: Article