Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial.
Arnold, David T; Tucker, Emma; Morley, Anna; Milne, Alice; Stadon, Louise; Patole, Sonia; Nava, George W; Walker, Steven P; Maskell, Nick A.
  • Arnold DT; Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Level 2, Learning & Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. Arnold.dta@gmail.com.
  • Tucker E; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK. Arnold.dta@gmail.com.
  • Morley A; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Milne A; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Stadon L; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Patole S; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Nava GW; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Walker SP; Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Level 2, Learning & Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
  • Maskell NA; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 330, 2022 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2009384
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pleural infection is a complex condition with a considerable healthcare burden. The average hospital stay for pleural infection is 14 days. Current standard of care defaults to chest tube insertion and intravenous antibiotics. There have been no randomised trials on the use of therapeutic thoracentesis (TT) for pleural fluid drainage in pleural infection. AIMS AND

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the feasibility of a full-scale trial of chest tube vs TT for pleural infection in a single UK centre. The primary outcome was defined as the acceptability of randomisation to patients.

METHODS:

Adult patients admitted with a pleural effusion felt to be related to infection and meeting criteria for drainage (based on international guidelines) were eligible for randomisation. Participants were randomised (11) to chest tube insertion or TT with daily review assessing need for further drainages or other therapies. Neither participant nor clinician were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients were followed up at 90 days post-randomisation.

RESULTS:

From September 2019 to June 2021, 51 patients were diagnosed with pleural infection (complex parapneumonic effusion/empyema). Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria for trial and 10 patients were randomised (91%). The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on recruitment. Data completeness was high in both groups with no protocol deviations. Patients randomised to TT had a significantly shorter overall mean hospital stay (5.4 days, SD 5.1) compared to the chest tube control group (13 days, SD 6.0), p = 0.04. Total number of pleural procedures required per patient were similar, 1.2 in chest tube group and 1.4 in TT group. No patient required a surgical referral. Adverse events were similar between the groups with no readmissions related to pleural infection.

CONCLUSIONS:

The ACTion trial met its pre-specified feasibility criteria for patient acceptability but other issues around feasibility of a full-scale trial remain. From the results available the hypothesis that TT can reduce length of stay in pleural infection should be explored further. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 84674413.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pleural Effusion / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Pulm Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12890-022-02126-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pleural Effusion / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Pulm Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12890-022-02126-4