Addressing cancer health disparities (CHD) in an independent community cancer clinic: All solutions are local

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19-associated global pandemic has brought many public and population health issues to light. A glaring issue is the disparities among and differences in susceptibility of diverse ethnicities. Viral infection is not the only area of healthcare facing this issue disparities in prevalence, biology, prognosis, and outcomes of cancer exist, often based on socioeconomics and social determinants of health (SDoH). CHD have been debated and discussed at several levels, from local counties to the congress to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Amid the debates and recommendations, it has been difficult to carve out a clear path forward. The complex factors involved include access to care because of financial challenges, biological and genetic factors, impact of SDoH, and access to screening, NGS testing, and clinical trials. CHD may contribute to almost 34% of deaths among adult cancer patients and additional spending of $230 billion. Addressing CHD could result in an indirect savings of as much as $1 trillion over 3 years (AACR, CDR, 2020). A comprehensive approach is needed to generate a groundswell of resources. This should include support for public policies aimed at improving understanding of the issue by all parts of the ecosystem (pharma, researchers, government agencies, physicians), adequate funding for federal and local initiatives, considerations of health in community planning and development, and collection of real-world data and evidence. At Carolina Blood and Cancer Care (CBCCA), the team decided to study this issue and initiate solutions one step at a time. Methods: CBCCA prioritized solutions in 5 categories. The top priority was to address issues impacting patients access to care, NGS testing, cancer screening, SDoH, and clinical trial access. To address access to care issue (financial constraints), 2.5 FTEs (full-time equivalents) were allocated to carry out needs assessments and identify resources, including Medicaid eligibility, dual eligibility, other foundations, and sources for free drugs. A not-for-profit entity, No One Left Alone, was started to address CHD. Results: During 2021 CBCCA physicians saw 1787 unique cancer patients (both established and new). Of these, 319 needed IV anticancer treatment and an additional 104 needed oral oncolytics. Fifty-three could not pay for their cancer treatment. Another 101 patients needed assistance for out-of-pocket costs. Financial counselors procured free drugs worth $1,633,588 and an additional $135,931 in cash assistance for high out-of-pocket costs. The pharmacy team raised $253,218 for 64 patients (374 transactions) for out-of-pocket costs. As a result, not a single patient was left without treatment. Conclusions: Financial toxicity was addressed by allocating 0.5 FTE per oncologist to ensure access to care. In the next phase, CBCCA will address access to NGS testing.