Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Before and During Pandemic Telemedicine Use: An Analysis of Rural and Urban Safety-Net Clinics.
Larson, Annie E; Zahnd, Whitney E; Davis, Melinda M; Stange, Kurt C; Yoon, Jangho; Heintzman, John D; Harvey, S Marie.
  • Larson AE; Research department, OCHIN, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: larsona@ochin.org.
  • Zahnd WE; Department of health management and policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Davis MM; Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon; School of Public Health, OHSU-Portland State Uuniversity, Portland, Oregon.
  • Stange KC; Center for community health integration, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Yoon J; Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Heintzman JD; Research department, OCHIN, Portland, Oregon; Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Harvey SM; College of public health and human sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
Am J Prev Med ; 63(6): 1031-1036, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2014796
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Differences in face-to-face and telemedicine visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among rural and urban safety-net clinic patients were evaluated. In addition, this study investigated whether rural patients were as likely to utilize telemedicine for primary care during the pandemic as urban patients.

METHODS:

Using electronic health record data from safety-net clinics, patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 visit before or during the COVID-19 pandemic, March 1, 2019-March 31, 2021, were identified, and trends in face-to-face and telemedicine (phone and video) visits for patients by rurality using Rural‒Urban Commuting Area codes were characterized. Multilevel mixed-effects regression models compared service delivery method during the pandemic by rurality.

RESULTS:

Included patients (N=1,015,722) were seen in 446 safety-net clinics 83% urban, 10.3% large rural, 4.1% small rural, and 2.6% isolated rural. Before COVID-19, little difference in the percentage of encounters conducted face-to-face versus through telemedicine by rurality was found. Telemedicine visits significantly increased during the pandemic by 27.2 percentage points among patients in isolated rural areas to 52.3 percentage points among patients in urban areas. Rural patients overall had significantly lower odds of using telemedicine for a visit during the pandemic than urban patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite the increased use of telemedicine in response to the pandemic, rural patients had significantly fewer telemedicine visits than those in more urban areas. Equitable access to telemedicine will depend on continued reimbursement for telemedicine services, but additional efforts are warranted to improve access to and use of health care among rural patients.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Prev Med Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Prev Med Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article