Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Bloodstream and respiratory coinfections in patients with COVID-19 on ECMO.
Shih, Emily; Michael DiMaio, J; Squiers, John J; Banwait, Jasjit K; Kussman, Howard M; Meyers, David P; Meidan, Talia G; Sheasby, Jenelle; George, Timothy J.
  • Shih E; Department of General Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Michael DiMaio J; Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Squiers JJ; Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Banwait JK; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • Kussman HM; Department of General Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Meyers DP; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • Meidan TG; Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Sheasby J; Infectious Disease, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • George TJ; Critical Care Medicine, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas, USA.
J Card Surg ; 37(11): 3609-3618, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2019481
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although several studies have characterized the risk of coinfection in COVID pneumonia, the risk of the bloodstream and respiratory coinfection in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) supports severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is poorly understood.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective analysis of patients with COVID-19 ARDS on ECMO at a single center between January 2020 and December 2021. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS:

Of 44 patients placed on ECMO support for COVID-19 ARDS, 30 (68.2%) patients developed a coinfection, and 14 (31.8%) patients did not. Most patients underwent venovenous ECMO (98%; 43/44) cannulation in the right internal jugular vein (98%; 43/44). Patients with coinfection had a longer duration of ECMO (34 [interquartile range, IQR 19.5, 65] vs. 15.5 [IQR 11, 27.3] days; p = .02), intensive care unit (ICU; 44 [IQR 27,75.5] vs 31 [IQR 20-39.5] days; p = .03), and hospital (56.5 [IQR 27,75.5] vs 37.5 [IQR 20.5-43.3]; p = .02) length of stay. When stratified by the presence of a coinfection, there was no difference in hospital mortality (37% vs. 29%; p = .46) or Kaplan-Meier survival (logrank p = .82). Time from ECMO to first positive blood and respiratory culture were 12 [IQR 3, 28] and 10 [IQR 1, 15] days, respectively. Freedom from any coinfection was 50 (95% confidence interval 37.2-67.2)% at 15 days from ECMO initiation.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is a high rate of co-infections in patients placed on ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS. Although patients with coinfections had a longer duration of extracorporeal life support, and longer length of stays in the ICU and hospital, survival was not inferior.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Coinfection / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Card Surg Journal subject: Cardiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jocs.16909

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Coinfection / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Card Surg Journal subject: Cardiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jocs.16909