Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010.
Holdroyd, Ian; Vodden, Alice; Srinivasan, Akash; Kuhn, Isla; Bambra, Clare; Ford, John Alexander.
  • Holdroyd I; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Vodden A; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Srinivasan A; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Kuhn I; Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
  • Bambra C; Medical Library, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Ford JA; Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(9): e063137, 2022 09 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2020061
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this systematic review is to explore the effectiveness of the National Health Inequality Strategy, which was conducted in England between 1999 and 2010.

DESIGN:

Three databases (Ovid Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for articles published that reported on changes in inequalities in health outcomes in England over the implementation period. Articles published between January 1999 and November 2021 were included. Title and abstracts were screened according to an eligibility criteria. Data were extracted from eligible studies, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool.

RESULTS:

The search strategy identified 10 311 unique studies, which were screened. 42 were reviewed in full text and 11 were included in the final review. Six studies contained data on inequalities of life expectancy or mortality, four on disease-specific mortality, three on infant mortality and three on morbidities. Early government reports suggested that inequalities in life expectancy and infant mortality had increased. However, later publications using more accurate data and more appropriate measures found that absolute and relative inequalities had decreased throughout the strategy period for both measures. Three of four studies found a narrowing of inequalities in all-cause mortality. Absolute inequalities in mortality due to cancer and cardiovascular disease decreased, but relative inequalities increased. There was a lack of change, or widening of inequalities in mental health, self-reported health, health-related quality of life and long-term conditions.

CONCLUSIONS:

With respect to its aims, the strategy was broadly successful. Policymakers should take courage that progress on health inequalities is achievable with long-term, multiagency, cross-government action. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021285770).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Health Status Disparities Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-063137

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Health Status Disparities Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-063137