RELATION BETWEEN COVID-19 AND ANCA VASCULITIS. STUDY IN A SINGLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

ABSTRACT

BackgroundAnti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) is a small vessel vasculitis. Hallmarked by the presence of antibodies against antigens in cytoplasmic granules of neutrophils. Different microbiological agents and vaccines can trigger an AAV, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine.ObjectivesTo compare a) proportion of positive ANCA (+ANCA) test in 2019 (COVID-19 pre-pandemic) vs 2021 (COVID-19 pandemic), b) clinical features and c) vasculitis activity between vasculitis related to COVID 19 vaccination vs non-related.MethodsAll ANCA tests performed in 2019 and 2021 in a referral hospital were reviewed. Additionally, we studied 18 +ANCA patients diagnosed in 2021 and accepted to participate in present study. The patients were divided in two groups a) +ANCA after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (COVID-related) and +ANCA before COVID-19 vaccine (COVID-nonrelated). Diagnosis of underlying AAV was based on ACR/EULAR 2022 criteria. Disease activity was assessed with Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS). ANCA testing was done by chemiluminescence assay using IO-FLASH (Inova, San Diego, CA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.ResultsANCA tests were positive in 14 of 1287 cases (1.1%) and in 32 of 1434 (2.2%) cases in 2019 and 2021, respectively (figure 1, the differences were statistically significant (p=0.020). The main features of 18 ANCA+ patients diagnosed in 2021 are summarized in table 1. COVID-19 related patients showed a median of 7 points on BVAS score compared of the median of 5 points on BVAS score on not related patients.ConclusionThere seems to be an increase of +ANCA at the expense of anti-PR3 antibodies following the COVID-19 vaccine. In patients with +ANCA following vaccination there seems to be an increased disease activity according to BVAS score without reaching statistical significance.References[1]Damoiseaux, J., et al Autoimmunity Reviews.2021. PMID 34896650.[2]Irure-Ventura, et al. IScience.2022. PMID 35937087.Table 1.Main general features of 18 patients with ANCA+ test diagnosed in 2021.FEATURESAll cases n= 18Related n= 13Non-related n= 5p*Age (years), mean±SD62±1767±15.352±16.50.167Male/ Female n, (% male)10/8 (55.6)9/4 (69.2%)1/4(20)0.067ANCA-test specificity, n (%)MPO-ANCA9 (50)7 (53.8)2(40)0.609PR3-ANCA8 (44.4)5 (38.5)3(60)0.423Both1 (5.6)1 (7.7)0-CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]2,4 [0.4-10.7]3.8 [0.4-10.1]1 [0.4-10.9]0.802ESR, mm/1st hours, median [IQR]50 [25-104]47 [25.3-71.8]50 [25-120]0.634BVAS, median [IQR]6.5 [4.2-8]7 [4-8]5 [5-8]0.842FFS, n (%)03 (16.7)2 (15.4)1 (20)0.819≥115 (83.3)11 (84.6)4 (80)0.819ENT involvement, n (%)12(66.7)10 (76.9)2 (40)0.148MSK involvement, n (%)11(61.1)7(53.8)4 (80)0.322CNS/PNS involvement, n (%)10 (55.6)7 (53.8)3 (60)0.819Lung involvement, n (%)9 (50)6 (46.2)3 (60)0.609Kidney involvement, n (%)8 (44.4)7 (53.8)1 (40)0.208Ocular involvement, n (%)2 (11.1)2 (15.4)00.366Cutaneous involvement, n (%)2 (11.1)02 (40)0.019*p values according to Man Whitney test.Abbreviations (in alphabetical order)AAV anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis;ACR American college of Rheumatology;ANCA Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody;BVAS Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score;CNS central nervous system;CRP C-Reactive protein;dL deciliter;ENT ear, nose, throat;ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate;FFS Five-Factors Score;g;IQR Interquartile range;mg milligram;MSK musculoskeletal;MPO-ANCA= ANCA specific for myeloperoxidase;n=Number;PNS peripheral nervous system;PR3-ANCA= ANCA specific for proteinase 3;SD Standard DeviationFigure 1.Comparison of ANCA test in 2019 and 2021.[Figure omitted. See PDF]AcknowledgementsNIL.Disclosure of InterestsFabricio Benavides-Villanueva None declared, Vanesa Calvo-Río Speakers bureau Dra V. Calvo had participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Roche, Novartis, Galápagos, UCB Pharma, MSD, Celgene, and Grünenthal and received support for attending m etings and/or travel from Janssen, Abbvie, Roche, Novartis, MSD, UCB Pharma, Celgene, Lilly, Pfizer, Galápagos., J. Loricera Speakers bureau Dr. J. Loricera had participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Roche, Novartis, Galápagos, UCB Pharma, MSD, Celgene, and Grünenthal., Consultant of Dr. J. Loricera had consultation fees in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Roche, Novartis, Galápagos, UCB Pharma, MSD, Celgene, and Grünenthal and received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen, Abbvie, Roche, Novartis, MSD, UCB Pharma, Celgene, Lilly, Pfizer, Galápagos., Juan Irure-Ventura None declared, Marcos Lopez-Hoyos None declared, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau Dr. R. Blanco had participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD., Consultant of Dr. R. Blanco had consultation from Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD., Grant/research support from Dr. R. Blanco received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD and Roche.