Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The specialty of allergy and clinical immunology in Brazil.
de Mello, Luane Marques; Serpa, Faradiba Sarquis; Chiabai, Joseane; Fernandes, Fátima Rodrigues; Chong-Neto, Herberto José; Sarinho, Emanuel Sávio Cavalcanti; Rubini, Norma de Paula Motta; Solé, Dirceu.
  • de Mello LM; Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Serpa FS; Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Chiabai J; Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Fernandes FR; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Sciences of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória, Vitória, Brazil.
  • Chong-Neto HJ; Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
  • Sarinho ESC; Scientific Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Rubini NPM; Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Solé D; Division of Allergy and Immunology Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Front Allergy ; 3: 933816, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20234694
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To assess the profile of allergist/immunologist (A/I) physicians in Brazil, the workplace, the access to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on professional practice.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was conducted as an online survey. All adhering members of the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) received a Google Forms tool by email. The questionnaire addressed sociodemographic and professional aspects of the Brazilian allergists/immunologists (A/I) daily routine. The information was analyzed by SPSS version 20.0.

Results:

Four hundred and sixty members answered the questionnaire. Women were predominant among the responders (336; 73%), and the median age was 47 years (range, 27-82 years). Most participants worked in the private sector (437, 95%), whereas 256 (47%) worked in the public sector. Among the public sector employees, 210 (82%) reported having access to some diagnostic test for allergic diseases and inborn errors of immunity. Only 91 (35%) A/I physicians in the public system had access to allergen-specific immunotherapy, compared to 416 (95, 9%) of those in the private sector. Regarding biological drugs, 135 (52.7%) and 314 (71.9%) of the A/I physicians working in the public and private sector, respectively, reported access. Two hundred and eighty-three (61.6%) had at least a 50% reduction in the number of consultations, and 245 (56%) provided telemedicine care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion:

Brazilian A/I have incorporated the most recent advances in managing immunoallergic diseases into their clinical practice, but they still have little access to various diagnostic methods. Strategies to enable the presence of A/I in public health services should be discussed and implemented. The coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the incorporation of telemedicine as a viable and promising method of medical care and can expand access to the specialty.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Front Allergy Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Falgy.2022.933816

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Country/Region as subject: South America / Brazil Language: English Journal: Front Allergy Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Falgy.2022.933816