Rehabilitation needs after critical illness: Referral outcomes from a ICU follow up clinic in Northern Ireland
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
; 24(1 Supplement):79-80, 2023.
Article
in English
| EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20237388
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
In 2019/20 a total of 171,900 people were admitted to adult general intensive care units (ICU) across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, with a survival rate of 79.6% at hospital discharge.1 Patients who survive critical illness and admission to ICU often experience ICU-related long-term physical and non-physical impairments and disability following hospital discharge.2 National guidance advocates multidisciplinary team (MDT) follow up to identify and manage the unmet health needs of this patient population.3-4 The UK has seen an increase in the number of follow up services available in the last 7 years.2 The Covid-19 pandemic further highlighted the need to provide this service, locally resulting in the establishment of the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (BHSCT) ICU follow up clinic in July 2020. The follow up clinic is offered to patients aged = 18 years, an ICU length of stay of = 4 days, who have been discharged from an inpatient setting within the last 12 weeks and do not receive follow up from any other established care pathway. The clinic consists of an ICU Nurse, Doctor, Clinical Psychologist and Physiotherapist. Patients are offered either a virtual, face-to-face or telephone appointment. Objective(s) To identify unmet rehabilitation needs and onward referral requirements of patients presenting at an ICU follow-up clinic in Northern Ireland. Method(s) Data was gathered retrospectively using an excel database detailing patient demographics, appointment details and onward referrals generated from the clinic. Data was analysed for a set time period between the 01/12/2021 - 09/02/2022. The type of referral and the profession responsible were captured. Result(s) During the time period eight post ICU follow up clinics were completed. A total of 36 patient's attended (14 male and 22 female). Six appointments were attended virtually via MS Teams, 12 via telephone and 18 face-to-face. Twenty-three (64%) of the patients required at least one onward health referral. A total of 61 onward health referrals were generated from this population. Table 1 details the number of onwards referrals by speciality. Conclusion(s) Approximately 64% of patients who attended the post ICU follow up clinic, during a 10 week period, demonstrated unmet rehabilitation needs resulting in onward health referrals. This data supports the need for a post ICU follow up clinic at BHSCT to identify ongoing need, ensure transition of care to relevant services and optimise patient's physical and psychological outcomes. One limitation of this study is that not all recommended allied health professionals are commissioned for the clinic which may impact on the health needs identified. Future work should consider the impact of this and discussions regarding the need for a commissioned post ICU follow up clinic which is truly MDT for this patient population should be considered.
adult; clinical article; clinical psychology; conference abstract; controlled study; coronavirus disease 2019; critical illness; demographics; disability; England; female; follow up; hospital discharge; hospital patient; human; intensive care unit; length of stay; male; multidisciplinary team; Northern Ireland; nurse; occupation; outcome assessment; pandemic; patient referral; physiotherapist; rehabilitation; retrospective study; social care; survival rate; telephone; transitional care; trust; Wales
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Databases of international organizations
Database:
EMBASE
Type of study:
Cohort study
/
Prognostic study
/
Qualitative research
Language:
English
Journal:
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Year:
2023
Document Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS