The Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights in the Coronavirus Pandemic in Germany
Democracy after Covid: Challenges in Europe and Beyond
; : 125-146, 2022.
Article
in English
| Scopus | ID: covidwho-20237548
ABSTRACT
The coronavirus pandemic has been a great challenge for most constitutional states in many aspects. This will be illustrated in this contribution taking Germany as an example, with the focus lying mainly on the rule of law principle and fundamental rights, examined in light of the case law developed so far. Notably during the first lockdown, a lot of fundamental rights in Germany were massively curtailed. This is why this unprecedented situation was sometimes qualified as a "state of emergency” or a "corona-dictatorship”, given that the breadth, depth and duration of the encroachments on fundamental rights were, and in some cases still are, exceptionally great. Nevertheless, the following contribution demonstrates that such an approach is misplaced. The German Basic Law ("Grundgesetz”) does not provide for a state of emergency or any other exceptional provisions regarding the interventions in fundamental rights in times of crisis. The traditional model of the separation of powers has proven to be sufficiently flexible to meet the needs for even far-reaching encroachments on fundamental rights on the one hand, and to adequately control and react to these encroachments in accordance with the rule of law on the other. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Databases of international organizations
Database:
Scopus
Type of study:
Observational study
Language:
English
Journal:
Democracy after Covid: Challenges in Europe and Beyond
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS