Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Publicly Funded Family Planning Organizations' Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Texas.
Lerma, Klaira; Carpenter, Emma; Chatillon, Anna; White, Kari.
  • Lerma K; Population Research Center and Texas Policy Evaluation Project, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Electronic address: klairalerma@utexas.edu.
  • Carpenter E; Population Research Center and Texas Policy Evaluation Project, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
  • Chatillon A; Population Research Center and Texas Policy Evaluation Project, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
  • White K; Population Research Center and Texas Policy Evaluation Project, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Steve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Department of Sociology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Womens Health Issues ; 33(3): 228-234, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238552
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of family planning services decreased, but there are limited data on how safety net providers were affected.

METHODS:

Between November 2020 and March 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with administrators at health departments, federally qualified health centers, and specialized family planning organizations across Texas about pandemic-related changes in family planning services. We analyzed interview transcripts using an inductive thematic approach.

RESULTS:

Administrators at the 19 participating organizations described pervasive service disruptions. Some organizations closed for 6-8 weeks at the pandemic's onset owing to safety uncertainties and difficulty interpreting Texas' March 2020 executive order prohibiting "nonessential" medical services; others later suspended services after staff exposures. Health departments and federally qualified health centers commonly decreased family planning services to focus on COVID-19 response, leaving specialized family planning organizations to absorb displaced reproductive health care clients. Some of the advantages of service delivery modifications-including telehealth, curbside and drive-through prescription pickup, and medication by mail-were difficult to realize; barriers included low reimbursement, necessary patient examinations, and clients' confidentiality concerns and lack of technological resources.

CONCLUSIONS:

Texas' diverse network of family planning organizations illustrated a range of responses to the pandemic, and organizations often focused on their core missions-public health, primary care, or family planning.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Family Planning Services / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Womens Health Issues Journal subject: Gynecology / Obstetrics / Women's Health Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Family Planning Services / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Womens Health Issues Journal subject: Gynecology / Obstetrics / Women's Health Year: 2023 Document Type: Article