Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Respiratory protection: what SARS-CoV-2 has taught us.
Loeb, Mark.
  • Loeb M; Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 36(4): 276-280, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238861
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes the epidemiological evidence for respiratory personal protective equipment for SARA-CoV-2, a topic of considerable controversy. RECENT

FINDINGS:

The main findings are that the observational studies and non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) randomized trials do not provide clear evidence that the N95 respirators offer superior protection over surgical masks. A randomized controlled trial on COVID-19 provides evidence that the absolute risk to healthcare workers over time using surgical masks is similar to N95 respirators.

SUMMARY:

The implications of the findings are that surgical masks and N95 respirators can be considered for respiratory protection in healthcare workers.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Protective Devices / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Curr Opin Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Qco.0000000000000930

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Protective Devices / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Curr Opin Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Qco.0000000000000930