Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using telemedicine: proof-of-concept cohort and failure modes and effects analyses.
Armitage, Laura C; Lawson, Beth K; Roman, Cristian; Thompson, Beth; Biggs, Christopher; Rutter, Heather; Lewis-Jones, Martin; Ede, Jody; Tarassenko, Lionel; Farmer, Andrew; Watkinson, Peter.
  • Armitage LC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Lawson BK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Roman C; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Thompson B; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Biggs C; Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Rutter H; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Lewis-Jones M; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Ede J; Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Tarassenko L; Heart Voices, British Heart Foundation, London, UK.
  • Farmer A; Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Watkinson P; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Wellcome Open Res ; 7: 39, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2025560
ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated adoption of remote consulting in healthcare. Despite opportunities posed by telemedicine, most hypertension services in Europe have suspended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

Methods:

We examined the process and performance of remotely delivered ABPM using two methodologies firstly, a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and secondly, a quantitative analysis comparing ABPM data from a subgroup of 65 participants of the Screening for Hypertension in the INpatient Environment (SHINE) diagnostic accuracy study. The FMEA was performed over seven sessions from February to March 2021, with a multidisciplinary team comprising a patient representative, a research coordinator with technical expertise and four research clinicians.

Results:

The FMEA identified a single high-risk step in the remote ABPM process. This was cleaning of monitoring equipment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, unrelated to the remote setting. A total of 14 participants were scheduled for face-to-face ABPM appointments, before the UK March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown; 62 were scheduled for remote ABPM appointments since emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic between November 2020 and August 2021. A total of 65 (88%) participants completed ABPMs; all obtained sufficient successful measurements for interpretation. For the 10 participants who completed face-to-face ABPM, there were 402 attempted ABPM measurements and 361 (89%) were successful. For the 55 participants who completed remote ABPM, there were 2516 attempted measurements and 2114 (88%) were successful. There was no significant difference in the mean per-participant error rate between face-to-face (0.100, SD 0.009) and remote (0.143, SD 0.132) cohorts (95% CI for the difference -0.125 to 0.045 and two-tailed P-value 0.353).

Conclusions:

We have demonstrated that ABPM can be safely and appropriately provided in the community remotely and without face-to-face contact, using video technology for remote fitting appointments, alongside courier services for delivery of equipment to participants.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Wellcome Open Res Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wellcomeopenres.17537.3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Wellcome Open Res Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wellcomeopenres.17537.3