Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination Experiences and Performance in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency.
Kelly, Ryan; Leung, Gentson; Lindstrom, Heather; Wunder, Shane; Yu, Jaime C.
  • Kelly R; From the MD Program, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada (RK); Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (GL); Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (HL, JCY); and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Colle
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(10): 947-953, 2022 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2029164
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Virtual education has been described before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies evaluating virtual objective structured clinical examinations with postgraduate learners are lacking. This study (1) evaluated the experiences of all participants in a virtual objective structured clinical examination and (2) assessed the validity and reliability of selected virtual objective structured clinical examination stations for skills in physical medicine and rehabilitation.

METHODS:

Convergent mixed-methods design was used. Participants included three physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs holding a joint virtual objective structured clinical examination. Analysis included descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Performance of virtual to previous in-person objective structured clinical examination was compared using independent t tests.

RESULTS:

Survey response rate was 85%. No participants had previous experience with virtual objective structured clinical examination. Participants found the virtual objective structured clinical examination to be acceptable (79.4%), believable (84.4%), and valuable for learning (93.9%). No significant differences between in-person and virtual objective structured clinical examination scores was found for three-fourth stations and improved scores in one fourth. Four themes were identified (1) virtual objective structured clinical examinations are better for communication stations; (2) significant organization is required to run a virtual objective structured clinical examination; (3) adaptations are required compared with in-person objective structured clinical examinations; and (4) virtual objective structured clinical examinations provide improved accessibility and useful practice for virtual clinical encounters.

CONCLUSIONS:

Utility of virtual objective structured clinical examinations as a component of a program of assessment should be carefully considered and may provide valuable learning opportunities going forward.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine / COVID-19 / Internship and Residency Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Journal subject: Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine / COVID-19 / Internship and Residency Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Journal subject: Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation Year: 2022 Document Type: Article