Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of COVID-19 on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A registry-based cohort-study from the German Resuscitation Registry.
Ristau, Patrick; Wnent, Jan; Gräsner, Jan-Thorsten; Fischer, Matthias; Bohn, Andreas; Bein, Berthold; Brenner, Sigrid; Seewald, Stephan.
  • Ristau P; Institute for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Wnent J; Institute for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Gräsner JT; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Fischer M; School of Medicine, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
  • Bohn A; Institute for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Bein B; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Brenner S; Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, ALB-FILS Kliniken, Göppingen, Germany.
  • Seewald S; Fire Department, City of Münster, Münster, Germany.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0274314, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2029787
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The global COVID-19 pandemic effects people and the health system. Some international studies reported an increasing number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Comparable studies regarding the impact of COVID-19 on incidence and outcome of OHCA are not yet available for Germany. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This epidemiological study from the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) compared a non-pandemic period (01.03.2018-28.02.2019) and a pandemic period (01.03.2020-28.02.2021) regarding the pandemic-related impact on OHCA care.

RESULTS:

A total of 18,799 cases were included. The incidence of OHCA (non-pandemic 117.9 vs. pandemic period 128.0/100,000 inhabitants) and of OHCA with resuscitation attempted increased (66.0 vs. 69.1/100,000). OHCA occurred predominantly and more often at home (62.8% vs. 66.5%, p<0.001). The first ECG rhythm was less often shockable (22.2% vs. 20.3%, p = 0.03). Fewer cases of OHCA were observed (58.6% vs. 55.6% p = 0.02). Both the bystander resuscitation rate and the proportion of telephone guided CPR remained stable (38.6% vs. 39.8%, p = 0.23; and 22.3% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.77). EMS arrival times increased (0839 min vs. 0908 min, p<0.001). Fewer patients reached a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (45.4% vs. 40.9%, p<0.001), were admitted to hospital (50.2% vs. 45.0%, p<0.001), and discharged alive (13.9% vs. 10.2%, p<0.001).

DISCUSSION:

Survival after OHCA significantly decreased while the bystander resuscitation rate remained stable. However, longer EMS arrival times and fewer cases of witnessed OHCA may have contributed to poorer survival. Any change to EMS systems in the care of OHCA should be critically evaluated as it may mean a real loss of life-regardless of the pandemic situation.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Emergency Medical Services / Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0274314

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Emergency Medical Services / Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0274314