Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Pandemic fatigue or enduring precautionary behaviours? Canadians' long-term response to COVID-19 public health measures.
Brankston, Gabrielle; Merkley, Eric; Loewen, Peter J; Avery, Brent P; Carson, Carolee A; Dougherty, Brendan P; Fisman, David N; Tuite, Ashleigh R; Poljak, Zvonimir; Greer, Amy L.
  • Brankston G; Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Canada.
  • Merkley E; Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Canada.
  • Loewen PJ; Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto, Canada.
  • Avery BP; Centre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada.
  • Carson CA; Centre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada.
  • Dougherty BP; Centre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada.
  • Fisman DN; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
  • Tuite AR; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
  • Poljak Z; Centre for Immunization Readiness, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Greer AL; Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Canada.
Prev Med Rep ; 30: 101993, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031627
ABSTRACT
The long-term dynamics of COVID-19 disease incidence and public health measures may impact individuals' precautionary behaviours as well as support for measures. The objectives of this study were to assess longitudinal changes in precautionary behaviours and support for public health measures. Survey data were collected online from 1030 Canadians in each of 5 cycles in 2020 June 15-July 13; July 22-Aug 8; Sept 7-15; Oct 14-21; and Nov 12-17. Precautionary behaviour increased over the study period in the context of increasing disease incidence. When controlling for the stringency of public health measures and disease incidence, mixed effects logistic regression models showed these behaviours did not significantly change over time. Odds ratios for avoiding contact with family and friends ranged from 0.84 (95% CI 0.59-1.20) in September to 1.25 (95% CI 0.66-2.37) in November compared with July 2020. Odds ratios for attending an indoor gathering ranged from 0.86 (95% CI 0.62-1.20) in August to 1.71 (95% CI 0.95-3.09) in October compared with July 2020. Support for non-essential business closures increased over time with 2.33 (95% CI 1.14-4.75) times higher odds of support in November compared to July 2020. Support for school closures declined over time with lower odds of support in September (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45-0.96]), October (OR 0.48 [95% CI 0.26-0.87]), and November (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.19-0.81]) compared with July 2020. In summary, respondents' behaviour mirrored government guidance between July and November 2020 and supported individual precautionary behaviour and limitations on non-essential businesses over school closures.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Language: English Journal: Prev Med Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.pmedr.2022.101993

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Language: English Journal: Prev Med Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.pmedr.2022.101993