Your browser doesn't support javascript.
How has the sustainability of countries changed after COVID-19? Evidence from the pandemics' first year.
Giannetti, B F; Fonseca, T; Agostinho, F; Santos, L C T; Almeida, C M V B.
  • Giannetti BF; Post-graduation Program on Production Engineering, Paulista University (UNIP), Brazil. Electronic address: biafgian@unip.br.
  • Fonseca T; Metropolitan University of Santos (UNIMES), Santos, Brazil; Aquaculture Center, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Brazil.
  • Agostinho F; Post-graduation Program on Production Engineering, Paulista University (UNIP), Brazil.
  • Santos LCT; Post-graduation Program on Production Engineering, Paulista University (UNIP), Brazil.
  • Almeida CMVB; Post-graduation Program on Production Engineering, Paulista University (UNIP), Brazil.
Sci Total Environ ; 855: 158766, 2023 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031676
ABSTRACT
The Covid-19 crisis has caused several social-related issues; the sanitary is, perhaps, the most significant one. Lockdowns and vaccination were implemented to fight the Covid-19 virus. From a sustainability perspective, Covid-19 has been considered a meaningful crisis driver that has affected nations' economies and social and natural capitals. The literature presents clues that effects appear to be different among countries. Recognizing its importance as public policies for sustainability, this study aims to assess how the sustainability of countries has changed after Covid-19, focusing on countries' economic power that reflects their capacity to face the crisis. A sample of 89 countries is considered, and 2019-2020 are set as base years for data gathering, which covers the first year of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability is conceptually supported and represented by a 3-D cube. The natural environment is expressed by the ecological footprint (EF) method, the economic capital by the gross domestic product (GDP), and the social capital by the happiness index. Results show that sustainability of economies was negatively affected after first year of Covid-19 crisis, but in different magnitudes, according to nations' economic power. While the sustainability of the wealthiest economies was slightly changed during 2019-2020 but maintained within the named 'useful-order' world (environmentally unsustainable, productive, and happy), the poorest economies pushed about 169 million people into the worst performance, reaching the 'ineffective' world (environmentally unsustainable, unproductive, and unhappy). Numbers highlight the inequalities of sustainability performance among countries, according to their capacity to face the Covid-19 crisis. The shield of the richest evaluated countries comprising 5 % of the world population is more powerful than the shield of the poorest evaluated countries carrying 67 % of the world population. Results claims for efforts to make different policies and provide economic support differently for countries, since although we are all under the same storm, but in different boats.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Total Environ Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Total Environ Year: 2023 Document Type: Article