Your browser doesn't support javascript.
COVID-19 therapies for inpatients: a review and quality assessment of clinical guidelines.
Wohl, David A; Espinueva, Aprille A; Dau, Lauren; Wang, Chen-Yu; Lachmann, Alexandra; Bam, Rujuta A; Rawal, Aaditya; Chappell-Smith, Kerris; Rockstroh, Juergen K.
  • Wohl DA; Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Espinueva AA; School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Dau L; Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Wang CY; Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Lachmann A; Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Bam RA; Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Rawal A; Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Chappell-Smith K; Costello Medical, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Rockstroh JK; Costello Medical, Cambridge, UK.
ERJ Open Res ; 8(4)2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2043111
ABSTRACT
Owing to condensed development processes, expanding evidence and differences in healthcare system characteristics, many COVID-19 guidelines differ in their quality and treatment recommendations, which has consequences for clinical practice. This review aimed to identify COVID-19 treatment guidelines, assess their quality and summarise their recommendations. Guidelines were identified for five therapies most commonly used among inpatients with COVID-19 (remdesivir, dexamethasone, tocilizumab, baricitinib and casirivimab/imdevimab) from 11 countries. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool. Full details of recommendations and supporting evidence were analysed for high-quality guidelines, defined as those scoring ≥50% in Domain 3 (Rigour of Development) of AGREE-II. Overall, guidelines differed substantially in their quality and, even among high-quality guidelines using the same evidence, recommendations regarding specific therapeutics varied. Potential reasons for this heterogeneity, including the availability and consistency of clinical data, visibility of trial end-points and context-specific factors, are discussed.

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 23120541.00236-2022

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 23120541.00236-2022