Your browser doesn't support javascript.
MedXFit-Effects of 6 months CrossFit® in sedentary and inactive employees: A prospective, controlled, longitudinal, intervention study.
Brandt, Tom; Schmidt, Annette; Schinköthe, Timo; Heinz, Elisabeth; Klaaßen, Yannik; Limbara, Selina; Mörsdorf, Marian.
  • Brandt T; Institute of Sports Science, Department of Human Sciences University of the Bundeswehr Munich Neubiberg Germany.
  • Schmidt A; Institute of Sports Science, Department of Human Sciences University of the Bundeswehr Munich Neubiberg Germany.
  • Schinköthe T; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich CCCLMU Munich Germany.
  • Heinz E; Institute of Sports Science, Department of Human Sciences University of the Bundeswehr Munich Neubiberg Germany.
  • Klaaßen Y; Institute of Sports Science, Department of Human Sciences University of the Bundeswehr Munich Neubiberg Germany.
  • Limbara S; Institute of Sports Science, Department of Human Sciences University of the Bundeswehr Munich Neubiberg Germany.
  • Mörsdorf M; Institute of Sports Science, Department of Human Sciences University of the Bundeswehr Munich Neubiberg Germany.
Health Sci Rep ; 5(5): e749, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2047606
ABSTRACT
Background and

Aims:

Sedentary behavior and physical inactivity are associated with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Muscle and mobility enhancing training is recommended to promote musculoskeletal fitness and prevent MSD. A functional fitness program emphasizing the importance of musculoskeletal fitness is provided by CrossFit®. However, data from long-term CrossFit® interventions assessing measures of musculoskeletal fitness in sedentary and inactive individuals does not exist.

Methods:

This prospective, controlled study investigates the effects of 6 months CrossFit® training (2×60 min/week) in inactive adults (in terms of <2 muscle or mobility enhancing training sessions per week) with predominantly sitting or standing occupations. 91 participants were initially assessed, 2 were excluded, 55 self-selected for intervention (IG), and 34 for the control group (CG). Primary endpoint was a change in mobility (Functional Movement Screen score). Secondary endpoints were changed in strength (maximum isometric strength in kg; Dr. Wolff BackCheck®), and well-being (WHO-5 score). Key exploratory endpoints were changes in back-issue measures (pain intensity, limitation, and frequency).

Results:

39 participants of IG and 31 of CG completed the evaluation after 6 months. The IG improved significantly more (p < 0.001) compared with the CG in the FMS (η² = 0.58), trunk extension (η² = 0.46), trunk flexion (η² = 0.47), trunk lateral flexion left (η² = 0.41), trunk lateral flexion right (η² = 0.42), upper body push (η² = 0.4), upper body pull (η² = 0.25), hip extension left (η² = 0.18), and hip extension right (η² = 0.4). Change of WHO-5 scores did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.55; η² = 0.01). Exploratory analysis of back-issue data showed a higher decrease for pain intensity, limitation, and frequency in the IG compared with the CG.

Conclusion:

This study proves for the first time within the scope of a prospective, controlled study the broad benefits of CrossFit® in inactive adults doing predominantly sedentary work.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Health Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Health Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article