Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Image Exchange in the Middle East: a Survey.
Eid, Monief; Al Mutairi, Mosa; Karakas, Hakki M; Al Bastaki, Usama Mohammad Hassan; Almosabihi, Abdulaziz Abdulrahman Nasser; Tash, Adel Abdulkader; Al Huqbani, Nasser Mohammed; AlMayman, Abdulelah Abdulrahman; Albarakati, Alabbas Nasser; AlRakaf, Reem; Alomair, Mohammed Othman; Awladthani, Bader.
  • Eid M; Enterprise Imaging & eHealth Senior Consultant, Victoria, BC, Canada. mmonief@moh.gov.sa.
  • Al Mutairi M; King Abdulaziz Medical City - Riyadh (KAMC-R), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Karakas HM; Imaging Services, Istanbul Health Authority, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Al Bastaki UMH; Curea, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Almosabihi AAN; Neurometrika-Tech, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Tash AA; Diagnostic Imaging Department, DHA, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • Al Huqbani NM; Radiology and Allied Services, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • AlMayman AA; National Heart Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Albarakati AN; Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • AlRakaf R; Cloud Solutions for Communication and IT, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alomair MO; Cloud Solutions for Communication and IT, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Awladthani B; Women Health Program, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Digit Imaging ; 35(4): 796-811, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2048330
ABSTRACT
Developing an enterprise approach to imaging technology rather than a radiology focus has recently increased. The communicator needs to be aware of this shift.The Middle East countries participated in the survey have confirmed the following major benefits of Medical Image Exchange ✔ Fast access to both image and report ✔ Enable tele-services for second opinion, consulting and reporting ✔ Improve patient journey, workflow and diagnosis ✔ Allowed more patient engagement to be in place The Middle East countries that participated in this survey have agreed on the following shared challenges regarding Medical Imaging Exchange ✔ Lack of enterprise imaging governance at the early stage of implementation. It will organize the who, when, and how. In addition, any fees and or payment involved for physicians ✔ Infrastructure availability to handle such large volume of data. Growing from mega-byte to petabyte per year is challenge for infrastructure. Cloud against On Premises-Installation implementation model ✔ Interoperability and integration to connect multi specialties from different systems. In addition, how far existing systems are ready for that. A standard-based framework is mature for image exchange, but what follows for other domains? There is a need to move beyond radiology images so as to include images from pathology, ophthalmology, and dermatology There are other countries in the region requiring guidance, support, and funding to move forward from the compact disc into internet-based interoperable image exchange. This should be considered part of the World Health Organization and the United Nation development to the region in the healthcare sector.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Radiology Information Systems Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Digit Imaging Journal subject: Diagnostic Imaging / Medical Informatics / Radiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10278-022-00689-6

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Radiology Information Systems Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Digit Imaging Journal subject: Diagnostic Imaging / Medical Informatics / Radiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10278-022-00689-6